Re: [VOTE] Adopting Bylaws

Hi Taylor, Thanks for the input; it's always valuable. :) We have discussed it a bit here and there. Initially upon project creation we did vote to prefer review then commit as opposed to the other way around (discuss thread here

Re: [VOTE] Adopting Bylaws

Hi Casey, I have a few questions (wearing my mentor hat ;) ): What are the differences between the proposed bylaws and the standard Apache procedures and guidelines? If there are no differences, Metron doesn't even need bylaws. If there are differences, can you point to a discussion thread,

Re: [VOTE] Adopting Bylaws

+1 (binding) On 8/17/16, 4:44 PM, "Casey Stella" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 5:44 PM, David Lyle wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> Adopt the bylaws as stated here >>

Re: [VOTE] Adopting Bylaws

+1 (binding) 17.08.2016, 11:49, "Casey Stella" : > This is a vote to adopt the bylaws as they are stated here > . > > This is a procedural vote, so it is simple majority rules and there will be > no

[VOTE] Adopting Bylaws

This is a vote to adopt the bylaws as they are stated here . This is a procedural vote, so it is simple majority rules and there will be no vetoes (as directed by the ASF here