can codec be chained up?

I am wondering if I can have 2 codecs chain up with one feeding the other. One use case could be: using exisiting TextLineCodec with build a new codec to deal with Http request/response semantic. The TextLineCodec already handles line delimiting. The new HttpCodec only need to handle Http req

HttpCodec for Http client?

Is there a HttpCodec already available for use by a client issuing Http request? - I think AsyncWeb has a Http codec for the server side. Thx Chuck

Re: How to set timeout to 800ms for read?

Hi Trustin, Thx for the reply. We need to be able to change the timeout value at runtime via config bean. Does IoSession.setIdleTime(IdleStatus, idleTime) calls java.net.Socket.setSoTimeout() - which takes millisecond according to the javadoc. what limits MINA to use only seconds? I've also ha

RE: HttpCodec for Http client?

You can find attached. ;) -- Murat OZDEMiR Software Developement Engineer -Original Message- From: Zheng, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:32 AM To: dev@mina.apache.org Cc: Zheng, Chuck Subject: HttpCodec for Http client? Is there a HttpCodec already

Re: can codec be chained up?

On May 3, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Zheng, Chuck wrote: One problem I see is that ProtocolEncoderOutput used by Http Encoder.encode() only has method write(ByteBuffer buf) which force the HttpCode to encode the request into ByteBuffer, but downstream TextLineEncoder.encode() expect a string!!! You are

Re: How to set timeout to 800ms for read?

On May 3, 2007, at 9:05 PM, Zheng, Chuck wrote: 1. I saw a ConnectException thrown by sun.nio.SocketChannelImpl during MINA's SocketConnector.processSessions()'s invocation to SocketChannel.finishConnect(). The ConnectException is eventually set to ConnectionRequest, but I don not see how it is

Re: Scale my gw server

Actually my end client application needs to know which server is "not busy" in order to connect to the right server. What do you guys normally do? 2007/5/3, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On May 3, 2007, at 10:08 AM, mat wrote: > No other peoples here have the same problem here? what's the c

msg sent twice?

Hi, I just found mina, and trying all the example. One thing that confused me when I run sumup client, the request was sent twice? the only parameters is '10' Is this the right behaviour? 74 [DatagramConnector-0] INFO org.apache.mina.example.sumup.ClientSessionHandler - [localhost/127.0.0.1:808

slides from apachecon eu 2007 talk

thanks to everyone that came out to my talk today. last talk on the last day is always tough! i've posted my slides online at http://people.apache.org/~proyal/MINA% 20AC%20EU%202007.pdf (although you'll miss everything that i said! come to the conference next time! :) -pete -- [EMAIL PRO

Double write msg?

Hi, I just found mina, and trying all the example. One thing that confused me when I run sumup client, the request was sent twice? the only parameters is '10' Is this the right behaviour? 74 [DatagramConnector-0] INFO org.apache.mina.example.sumup.ClientSessionHandler - [localhost/127.0.0.1:808

Re: slides from apachecon eu 2007 talk

Nice slides! Here is a tiny url: http://tinyurl.com/2o38xn On 5/4/07, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks to everyone that came out to my talk today. last talk on the last day is always tough! i've posted my slides online at http://people.apache.org/~proyal/MINA% 20AC%20EU%202007.pd

protocol

Can anyone help me out with my protocol design? Is it better to design protocol as a fixed length or non fixed length? What I meant is fixed lenght message(for instance 512bytes) for each message? Non fixed length means the message size could be big. Which method is better? If fixed length, i face

Re: slides from apachecon eu 2007 talk

slice 60. Scalablity sucks? what is that supposed to mean? 2007/5/5, Cameron Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Nice slides! Here is a tiny url: http://tinyurl.com/2o38xn On 5/4/07, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks to everyone that came out to my talk today. last talk on the > last

Re: slides from apachecon eu 2007 talk

On 5/5/07, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks to everyone that came out to my talk today. last talk on the last day is always tough! i've posted my slides online at http://people.apache.org/~proyal/MINA% 20AC%20EU%202007.pdf (although you'll miss everything that i said! come to the co

Re: protocol

i think have a constant size header which will contain payload length for rest of message. On 5/5/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can anyone help me out with my protocol design? Is it better to design protocol as a fixed length or non fixed length? What I meant is fixed lenght message(for ins

Re: slides from apachecon eu 2007 talk

On May 5, 2007, at 5:08 AM, mat wrote: slice 60. Scalablity sucks? what is that supposed to mean? heh, you missed everything that i said! it was a more rapid-fire presentation style, and i opted to talk more than putting a bunch of words on the slides. it was in reference to running with