[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-416.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Changed as following:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=562355
On 7/31/07, James Im <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>So for the case that we're talking about, I think that we agree that
> >>we've found a potential problem. The question is not then IF it will be
> >>a problem in practice or not, but rather HOW do we fix it. I believe
> >>that making the selecto
Possible visibility problem against Selector access
---
Key: DIRMINA-416
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-416
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Transport
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-413.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Trustin Lee
Done... although we need further refactoring of docume
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee updated DIRMINA-410:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-M1)
1.0.5
Assignee: Trustin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-410.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I made the following changes to simplify DefaultIoFilterChainBuilder:
http://
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 07:55 -0700, peter royal wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2007, at 11:50 PM, James Im wrote:
> > An alternative to synchronization would be to declare the selector
> > final. However this doesn't seems to be possible without some broader
> > refactoring.
>
> ... which i would love to see
On 8/2/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the spirit of getting ready for a 2.0 release, we should formulate a list
> of where we need the most work in the area of documentation. There are not
> many entries in JIRA for documentation, and to say "Javadocs need
> improvement" might be too vag
Thanks, i will next time. Appreciate your responsiveness.
Seth
> Thanks Trustin, makes sense.
Thanks for feed back, but it would be nice if you can reply to
dev@mina.apache.org instead of me next time.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/passing-settings-into-an-IoHandler
On 8/3/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which means: instead of let users "GUESS" the traffic rate, the mina core
> will take care of that?
It will be provided as a form of an IoFilter rather than being tightly
integrated with core. But I think we need more discussion about how
to control the
Which means: instead of let users "GUESS" the traffic rate, the mina core
will take care of that?
On 8/3/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/3/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > WriteThrottleFilter is different from this solution?
>
> No, we will merge ReadThrottleFilter and Wr
On 8/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Trustin, makes sense.
Thanks for feed back, but it would be nice if you can reply to
dev@mina.apache.org instead of me next time.
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID:
On 8/3/07, Tan Ka Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >For now, session idle time and write timeout can not be configured in
> >an IoC manner because they don't belong to IoSessonConfig but
> directly
> >to IoSession. I think Moving these properties to IoSessionConfig so
> >they can be configured be
On 8/3/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WriteThrottleFilter is different from this solution?
No, we will merge ReadThrottleFilter and WriteThrottleFilter to
provider better user experience.
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID:
WriteThrottleFilter is different from this solution?
On 8/2/07, Trustin Lee (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
>
> Trustin Lee updated DIRMINA-302:
> --
To me, DIRMINA-302 is so important. I wish it will be fixed. Thanks.
On 8/2/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi community,
>
> Since we've been working so hard to clean the overall API up in trunk,
> I fell we are getting closer to the release of 2.0.0-M1, our first
> milestone relea
>For now, session idle time and write timeout can not be configured in
>an IoC manner because they don't belong to IoSessonConfig but
directly
>to IoSession. I think Moving these properties to IoSessionConfig so
>they can be configured before an IoSession is created. WDYT?
Hello, I have a sugge
Hi Seth,
On 8/3/07, Seth Pollack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i'm working on my first MINA project, and i'm wondering what the best
> practice is for passing additional state into my IoHandler. For example, i
> want to pass in what the idle timeout period should be (as determined
> el
Hello,
i'm working on my first MINA project, and i'm wondering what the best
practice is for passing additional state into my IoHandler. For example, i
want to pass in what the idle timeout period should be (as determined
elsewhere in my code), references to some external objects, etc.
Of cour
As Julien suggested, I try to wrote a small testimonial on Mina.
Mina was the rock that was missing in my project when we started to
think about it. When I found it, one year ago, I started very quickly my
project (OpenLSD for Open Legacy Storage Document as a framework for
document archiving for
On Jul 30, 2007, at 11:50 PM, James Im wrote:
An alternative to synchronization would be to declare the selector
final. However this doesn't seems to be possible without some broader
refactoring.
... which i would love to see if you want to take it on :)
-pete
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://f
On Jul 27, 2007, at 4:15 AM, Mark Webb wrote:
I am thinking that it might be best to keep the two separate. The
separation of the session and slf4j is best IMHO.
I'm also in favor of keeping them separate.
-pete
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME c
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:05:20 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My 2 cents for this future big event.
> For Trustin question:
> - DIRMINA-382 close feature waiting for all messages to be written
> For me it could be interesting since it would allow another way
> to close connections from a serve
My 2 cents for this future big event.
For Trustin question:
- DIRMINA-382 close feature waiting for all messages to be written
For me it could be interesting since it would allow another way to close
connections from a server in a clean approach. However, the close with a
timeout is pro
In the spirit of getting ready for a 2.0 release, we should formulate a list
of where we need the most work in the area of documentation. There are not
many entries in JIRA for documentation, and to say "Javadocs need
improvement" might be too vague. So if people want to reply with a list of
docu
On 8/2/07, alimli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I use IoSession.get/setAttribute to store session specific information. I
> wonder if I have to perform this operations in a
> synchronized () { } block? Is locking IoSession is
> right or do I have to lock some other object?
A lock is acquire
Hi community,
Since we've been working so hard to clean the overall API up in trunk,
I fell we are getting closer to the release of 2.0.0-M1, our first
milestone release from 2.0 branch. To make the relese cycle shorter,
I'd like to ask all the community members about what issues you think
import
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee updated DIRMINA-188:
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M1
I found out how to create a all-in-one JAR. Let me fix it soon...
> All-i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee updated DIRMINA-375:
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M1
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.1.0)
Will fix this issue in 2.0.0-M
Hi,
I use IoSession.get/setAttribute to store session specific information. I
wonder if I have to perform this operations in a
synchronized () { } block? Is locking IoSession is
right or do I have to lock some other object?
Thanks,
alimli
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com
Proxy support
-
Key: DIRMINA-415
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-415
Project: MINA
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Core
Reporter: Trustin Lee
Fix For: 2.0.0-M1
There has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee updated DIRMINA-302:
Component/s: (was: Core)
Filter
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M1
Will fix this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee updated DIRMINA-68:
---
Component/s: Core
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M1
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Improvement)
Wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-414.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I already checked in the fix in coordination with the reporter (James Gould).
He
Infinite loop in SSLFilter on the server side when the client requests
renegotiation.
-
Key: DIRMINA-414
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-414
Projec
35 matches
Mail list logo
