On 8/7/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In ClientSessionHandler
>
> public void messageReceived(IoSession session, Object message) {
>// server only sends ResultMessage. otherwise, we will have to
> identify
>// its type using instanceof operator.
>ResultMessage rm = (Re
On 8/7/07, Mike Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trustin,
>
> Did you fix DefaultFileRegion? I don't see that change in svn.
Oops. I forgot to check in. It's done now.
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
Trustin,
Did you fix DefaultFileRegion? I don't see that change in svn.
-Mike
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:57 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote:
> On 8/7/07, Geoff Cadien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've run into a bug in DefaultFileRegion. In the method
> >
> > public void setPosition(long value) {
>
In ClientSessionHandler
public void messageReceived(IoSession session, Object message) {
// server only sends ResultMessage. otherwise, we will have to
identify
// its type using instanceof operator.
ResultMessage rm = (ResultMessage) message;
if (rm.isOk()) {
i use windows xp,the client is cmd.exe
by the way ,use putty,choose raw connection,it shows the input ,but no show
output.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/why-my-client-show-nothing-tf4227599s16868.html#a12027929
Sent from the Apache MINA Support Forum mailing list archi
On 8/7/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It normally takes 1 or 2 days to get OOM on my server. However, memory leak
> does happen as you can see. Since I can't wait OOM until it happens, I just
> simply modify the Sumupserver example to prove the memory leak may caused by
> mina core. (I assume
On 8/7/07, satish viswanatham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure. I can take a look at it. Is there any documentation or sample
> Transport implementation?
Unfortunately, there's no documentation on implementing a new
transport yet. You could take a look into an existing transport
implementations.
On 8/7/07, ukong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Opps I find that in the next release there is no more pooling. My bad.
>
> But any ideas about the advantage of using direct buffer for writing?
Direct buffers outpeform heap buffers if the content of the buffer is
not modified at all. A proxy might
On 8/7/07, Messi Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, Trustin
> thx for your reply.
> Is Mina1.1.2 already resolved this issue? How could I get Mina1.1.2?
>
> thx a lot! :)
It's not released yet. You can build the latest snapshot by yourself
meanwhile. If you can wait a few days, then please
On 8/7/07, cyliao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i run the example in "http://mina.apache.org/quick-start-guide.html";.
> below is the log at server:
> MINA Time server started.
> 2007-8-7 1:44:04 org.apache.mina.util.SessionLog info
> 信息: [/127.0.0.1:2006] CREATED
> 2007-8-7 1:44:04 org.apache.min
Hi, Trustin
thx for your reply.
Is Mina1.1.2 already resolved this issue? How could I get Mina1.1.2?
thx a lot! :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/java.lang.NullPointerException%3A--selector.wakeup%28%29--tf4227434s16868.html#a12027713
Sent from the Apache MINA Support F
On 8/7/07, Geoff Cadien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've run into a bug in DefaultFileRegion. In the method
>
> public void setPosition(long value) {
>if (value < position) {
>throw new IllegalArgumentException("New position value may not
> be less than old position value");
>
On 8/7/07, Messi Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, all
> I have a server A, which could receive client's request, then connect to
> other server B to fetch informations and return back to the client.
> This problem happened when I tested serverA's performance. I simulated 300
> concurrent cli
i run the example in "http://mina.apache.org/quick-start-guide.html";.
below is the log at server:
MINA Time server started.
2007-8-7 1:44:04 org.apache.mina.util.SessionLog info
信息: [/127.0.0.1:2006] CREATED
2007-8-7 1:44:04 org.apache.mina.util.SessionLog info
信息: [/127.0.0.1:2006] OPENED
Sessio
Hi, all
I have a server A, which could receive client's request, then connect to
other server B to fetch informations and return back to the client.
This problem happened when I tested serverA's performance. I simulated 300
concurrent client sent requests constantly, and let server B return 200k
I've run into a bug in DefaultFileRegion. In the method
public void setPosition(long value) {
if (value < position) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("New position value may not
be less than old position value");
}
count += value - position;
position
In MINA TRUNK, we've added support so that you can do
IoSession.write(File) or IoSession.write(FileChannel) and it will use
FileChannel.transferTo() to send the file to the remote host. This
should be faster then reading the file manually because
FileChannel.transferTo() can do zero-copy read/writ
Should we update the NOTICE.txt files to indicate a copyright of 2007
for these releases?
-Mike
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 16:58 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We released 1.0.4 and 1.1.1 just about two weeks ago, but I feel like
> it's time for new releases because 8 issues have been resolved s
Opps I find that in the next release there is no more pooling. My bad.
But any ideas about the advantage of using direct buffer for writing?
Pooling direct buffer hurts performance, but probably can bring down the
memory footprint. Some users might want to control over memory usage???
ukong wro
I am just a casual user of MINA but I come across looking at the source code
of PooledByteBufferAllocator when I found out that my app has been using a
lot non-heap memory which does not seem to release.
I believe direct buffers are not garbaged collected but in the current
implementation of Pool
Sure. I can take a look at it. Is there any documentation or sample
Transport implementation?
thanks
Satish
On 8/6/07, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 5, 2007, at 11:12 AM, satish viswanatham wrote:
> > I did not see a way to set this in Java SE APIs, but I found a
> > library i
It normally takes 1 or 2 days to get OOM on my server. However, memory leak
does happen as you can see. Since I can't wait OOM until it happens, I just
simply modify the Sumupserver example to prove the memory leak may caused by
mina core. (I assume sumupserver has no memory leak itself)
On 8/7/07
On Aug 5, 2007, at 11:12 AM, satish viswanatham wrote:
I did not see a way to set this in Java SE APIs, but I found a
library in
Java which lets you set DF bit:
http://netresearch.ics.uci.edu/kfujii/jpcap/doc/javadoc/index.html
Since setting that bit is not something that is in the standard j
On Aug 5, 2007, at 4:56 PM, mat wrote:
The following are the GC dump: Can you see someting here?
Did you set the JVM parameter to have it generate a heap snapshot
upon OOM?
Read http://blogs.sun.com/alanb/entry/
heapdumponoutofmemoryerror_option_in_5_0u7
Use -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryErr
Will do, Trustin. As for making this a part of the
general distribution and submitting the patch through
Jira, I assume that I should follow the guidelines in
the developer guide and then attach the patch's source
files for classes & unit tests to the jira issue. Am
I missing anything there?
-La
[GC 512K->175K(1984K), 0.0029448 secs]
[GC 687K->203K(1984K), 0.0016242 secs]
[GC 715K->215K(1984K), 0.0012507 secs]
[GC 727K->253K(1984K), 0.0019461 secs]
[GC 765K->292K(1984K), 0.0014474 secs]
[GC 804K->329K(1984K), 0.0011993 secs]
[GC 841K->342K(1984K), 0.0008107 secs]
I think the above is also
Hi Matthew,
On 8/5/07, Matthew Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a timer thread inside a custom IoFilter that checks for
> request timeouts after sending a message. If a timeout occurs, it
> sends a synthetic message down the filter chain. The question is, is
> this thread s
On 8/6/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/6/07, leafsax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I was trying to use MINA to transfer files between machines. It was
> > pretty
> > > good when I was trying to send some small fi
On 8/6/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/6/07, leafsax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I was trying to use MINA to transfer files between machines. It was
> pretty
> > good when I was trying to send some small files, but when the requests
> were
> > larger, (a file > 10
Hi Marcin,
Thanks for the reference to that book :) Just wanted to say that I am [so
far] a mina 'user' and not a 'developer' with little experience of maven; so
that book will be very helpful to me :) Hope I can get some examples running
now :)
Thanks again for the links :)
Regards,
Sim085
On 8/6/07, leafsax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I was trying to use MINA to transfer files between machines. It was pretty
> good when I was trying to send some small files, but when the requests were
> larger, (a file > 100M), I could not send the file correctly. Since I could
> not send
31 matches
Mail list logo
