Hi,
Here is the scenario that I am running into. I am running a TCP server,
which should be receive messages of size upto 2k in one chunk.
I do the following config that is used in acceptor bind:
SocketAcceptorConfig cfg = new SocketAcceptorConfig();
cfg.getSessionConfig().setRe
Hey Bogdan,
You should be just fine using MINA. We are using MINA in Openfire and so
far we got up to 170K concurrent connections in a single JVM. Those 170K
sockets were sending traffic to the server all the time. In any case, it's
up to your processing logic to be as fast as the incoming rate. O
Hello,
I would like to use Apache MINA for building a server that should scale well.
The server will publish data to lots of clients (around 30 000).
The majority of these connections will be active a few hours. The data
being sent to the clients is small but at a high frequency (500-1000
millise
Hi everyone,
We finally came to the release of this new version of the SMTP server that now
relies on MINA's high performance NIO layer. Any suggestion's, improvement's
ideas or simply experience feedbacks are welcome.
Official message : http://www.subethamail.org/se/archive_msg.jsp?msgId=33545
As previously discussed here
(http://www.nabble.com/MINA-%2B-continuations-tf4686670s16868.html) I've
been playing around with combining commons-javaflow and MINA. Now, I've
added the code to the sandbox. I would be very happy if you would check
it out and tell me what you think of it.
You need to
On 10/26/07, johnnyv_cn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> I am using MINA in my project to implement a TCP server. The server needs
> to hold long-lived connections with clients. The server and clients use
> HTTP-like protocol to exchange xml messages. Here is a simlified message
> exampl
Yes. The number of threads that handle the eventQueue in
SessionBuffer per session is at most 1 at the same time. That's how
the message order is maintained.
HTH,
Trustin
On 10/26/07, tiandike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> then the number of thread that handle eventQueue in SessionBuffer for
Dear all,
I am using MINA in my project to implement a TCP server. The server needs
to hold long-lived connections with clients. The server and clients use
HTTP-like protocol to exchange xml messages. Here is a simlified message
example:
POST / HTTP/1.1
Content-Length: 69
"Content-Length" is
On 10/26/07, tiandike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I find in ExecutorFilter the request will be wrapped in event and put in
> SessionBuffer.eventQueue field .
> If my handler handle request slow and client send request faster ,will the
> size of eventQueue became huge and lead to OutofMemo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-432.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I added the following:
* Set IoService.broadcast(Object message)
* CompositeI
then the number of thread that handle eventQueue in SessionBuffer for one
connector(session?) is at most 1 at the same time?
Trustin Lee wrote:
>
> On 10/25/07, tiandike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I debug the source code and find it's SessionBuffer to maintain the
>> order ,
>
> True.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee updated DIRMINA-432:
Assignee: Trustin Lee (was: Julien Vermillard)
Issue Type: New Feature (was:
I find in ExecutorFilter the request will be wrapped in event and put in
SessionBuffer.eventQueue field .
If my handler handle request slow and client send request faster ,will the
size of eventQueue became huge and lead to OutofMemoryException error?
Thanks
--
View this message in conte
Thanks!
when i config these param ,the question disappear.
I find in GenericObjectPool.java :
/**
* The default cap on the total number of active instances from the
pool.
* @see #getMaxActive
*/
public static final int DEFAULT_MAX_ACTIVE = 8;
I doubt the phenomenon has
14 matches
Mail list logo
