jgenender wrote:
Hey guys,
I was hoping to see if we could discuss some of the final qualifiers
on some of the methods in the AbstractIOSession. The reason I ask is it
would be cool to be able to override some of the methods such as:
public WriteFuture write(Object message)
public
quicksilverm28 wrote:
I also see that if I just overload messageReceived and remove
StreamIOHaandler then I am getting partial bytes. Is there a workaround to
this issue ?
If there is no workaround, would it mean that streaming is impossible using
NIO ?
What were you expecting to get in
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 12:26:17 -0800 (PST)
keeper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
In my project I use MINA2 for interaction with device by serial COM
port. I'm interesting in next question: How session wich connectred
with single COM port will behave, in case several threads write in it
Steve Johns-2 wrote:
Did everyone test if Mina drops the message under heavy loading? In Mina
wesite, I only saw the HTTP server benchmark test. Does everyone have the
pure socket server benchmark test result? Thanks in advance.
Hi!
I can't agree to this. But there are some reasons why
Steve Ulrich (proemion) wrote:
Emmanuel Lecharny-3 wrote:
Wouldn't be a perfect case for an assert ? Like :
public final WriteFuture write(Object message, SocketAddress
remoteAddress) {
assert message != null : Null messages are not allowed;
...
wdyt ?
NO!
I must confirm that this 'cholesterol' thing is a terrible one (may be caused
by the java.lang.TooMuchFoieGrasEatingException when using multiple threads ^^)
so be carefull.
Happy new year 2k8 to all of you
Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
- Message
I have server which is receiving data from multiple clients. The data is not
standard protocol. Each client is sending bunch of binrary files .bin files
. The data is received by the server from each socket and written on the
file system for later processing.
I wanted to do stream I\O on this.
Hi
The MINA PMC has voted for accepting FtpServer from the Apache Incubator
as a subproject of MINA. For me, as a commiter on the FtpServer project
this is great. We've been using MINA as our main network implementation
for some time and I'm a big fan of the project. MINA is the perfect home
Hi everybody and happy new year to all the members of the MINA
community.
During the Xmas rest, I had an idea (who said boredom ?:D) for improving
the testing of my different codec and protocol implementations.
The idea could be to create a fuzzing based IOFilter for brute force
testing protocol
I have been using the FTP server for some time. This is great news!!
On Jan 2, 2008 7:27 AM, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
The MINA PMC has voted for accepting FtpServer from the Apache Incubator
as a subproject of MINA. For me, as a commiter on the FtpServer project
this
Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi everybody and happy new year to all the members of the MINA
community.
During the Xmas rest, I had an idea (who said boredom ?:D) for improving
the testing of my different codec and protocol implementations.
The idea could be to create a fuzzing based IOFilter
Hi Niklas,
I'm interested in FtpServer project. Can I participate in the software
development?
Regards,
Gusniawan
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niklas Gustavsson
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 8:27 PM
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: Moving
On Dec 31, 2007, at 2:55 AM, James Mansion wrote:
Has anyone considered how subprocesses might be accomodated in mina?
It seems to me that this isn't quite like the serial port active
connection support since we have three channels to manage.
Perhaps if we had a process starter then we
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 20:27, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
hat type=ftpserver mentor
2. Mailing lists: FtpServer currently has a dev list with a fairly low
traffic with on average one mail per day. Should we keep this separate
from the main MINA dev list or merge them?
I suggest that
14 matches
Mail list logo
