Yes, but I think I need to consider more things like the changes in
IoBuffer together for better solution.
2008-03-10 (월), 23:39 -0700, Sangjin Lee 쓰시길:
> I might have misunderstood what you're proposing. Are you proposing to get
> rid of the UnderivableBuffer, not the CumulativeDecoder?
> Than
Make ConnectFuture ready right after sessionCreated.
Key: DIRMINA-545
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-545
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Cor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-545.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Done. It was a very simple fix because ConnectFuture.setSession() is called
only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-546.
---
Resolution: Fixed
The following test method:
@Test
public void mina() throws Exception {
Reduce unnecessary system calls when a new session is created.
--
Key: DIRMINA-546
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-546
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Improvement
Dear friends,
How can we make load balancing to our Mina based J2SE applications into
various servers?
Murat OZDEMiR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577412#action_12577412
]
Trustin Lee commented on DIRMINA-546:
-
I also did comparison against simple blocking I
Reduce unnecessary thread creation and destruction caused by IdleStatusChecker
--
Key: DIRMINA-547
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-547
Project: MINA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-547.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Done.
> Reduce unnecessary thread creation and destruction caused by IdleStatusCh
1a) has been resolved:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-546
Performance has been significantly improved for short-living
connections.
I didn't resolve '1b)' because these getter calls are essential in most
case. For example, they are usually used for logging.
3) also has been reso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-534.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-M2)
Assignee: Trustin Lee
>
Hi,
A good idea would be getting rid of the "concurrency" dependency.
It's used only for the ThreadPoolFilter, which is not needed for using
with MINA because MINA already do that.
The two options are :
1 - short one : delete it, nobody use it, we all plug mina behind
Asyncweb,
2 - longer one :
subclass of CumulativeDecoder throws an UnsupportedOperationException if
IoBuffer.slice() is used
-
Key: DIRMINA-548
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA
Excellent thanks for this. BTW eventually I'd like to start discussing the
various extension points for the container. Like bundles for services and
filters.
Alex
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:25 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: jvermillard
> Date: Mon Mar 10 23:25:03 2008
> New Revision:
Trustin,
Could you provide more information on the way in which you test and
profile MINA. I would like to set up a test environment, but am
curious as to how others set theirs up. As for the profiler, I use
YourKit and have been really happy with it.
The only comment I have is for #2. Could w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Furness updated DIRMINA-415:
--
Attachment: mina-connector-proxy-1.1.0.zip
Updated to better support IoC containers. Fixed som
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Furness updated DIRMINA-415:
--
Attachment: (was: mina-connector-proxy-1.0.0.zip)
> Proxy support
> -
>
>
I referenced ConnectFuture b/c it shows the building of the connection
and the session.write(...).
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:34 PM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uh.. you probably wanted to mention WriteFuture?
>
>
> http://mina.apache.org/report/trunk/apidocs/org/apache/mina
All -
We are having some strange behavior with our MINA 1.0.9-based server during
load test. I may be misinterpreting the purpose of an executor in the
filter chain - please let me know if I have an incorrect understanding of
its usage.
Our server is a pretty simple asynchronous request/response
I see now that this is the expected behavior in Mina 1.x. We can't use Mina
2.0/UnorderedExecutorFilter as we cannot use Java 1.5 in our environment.
Has anyone published a custom version of an unordered ExecutorFilter for
Java 1.4? Otherwise I guess we'll just write our own.
Thanks,
Matt
On Tu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rich Dougherty updated DIRMINA-499:
---
Attachment: bindings-for-scala.3.patch
Updated patch to latest revision on trunk (635930) an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577636#action_12577636
]
Rich Dougherty commented on DIRMINA-514:
A "me too" for this bug.
I see this pro
Hi students and potential MINA mentors,
I had a couple conversations with a few peeps that wished they had a month
or two to write a slick new framework for load testing MINA based
applications while using MINA itself to write the framework. My experiences
with MINA and various crappy tools out t
You can still implement your own ExecutorFilter with MINA 1.x. It sould
be pretty easy. Another option is to use byte code manipulation tool
such as retrotranslator.
2008-03-11 (화), 15:04 -0400, Matt Mehalso 쓰시길:
> I see now that this is the expected behavior in Mina 1.x. We can't use Mina
> 2.
Oh I see. :)
2008-03-11 (화), 14:11 -0400, Mark Webb 쓰시길:
> I referenced ConnectFuture b/c it shows the building of the connection
> and the session.write(...).
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:34 PM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Uh.. you probably wanted to mention WriteFut
I think this is a great idea considering every bottleneck we find out
eventually is often a backend such as database. I'd like to ping my
colleagues who are trying to store web documents into MySQL database.
Cheers,
2008-02-04 (월), 12:12 -0700, Mike Heath 쓰시길:
> This past weekend I made a releas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-529.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Trustin Lee
Thanks for the patch. It has been applied to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577680#action_12577680
]
Trustin Lee commented on DIRMINA-529:
-
I'm not sure that isPrimitive() is slower than
I just wrote a very simple JUnit test case that measures the amount of
time taken to connect and disconnect from MINA server. It takes only a
few minutes to write it, and the improvement was obvious (about 2~3
times faster)
I used YourKit profiler to track this problem, and I compared MINA with
s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577686#action_12577686
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-258:
---
I have the code compiling and running with the 2.0
Inconsistency in managed session set under heavy load
-
Key: DIRMINA-549
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-549
Project: MINA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-549.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by moving more code blocks under the synchronized (managedSessions) bloc
Your analysis is correct, and I've just checked in the fix. However, I
don't think your issue is related with MINA 2, because it uses a
different way to manage a session set. Please check if my fix fixes
your problem and close the following issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-54
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee updated DIRMINA-531:
Attachment: JUTestSessionCloseRegression.java
I tried to reproduce the problem you described, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577704#action_12577704
]
trustin edited comment on DIRMINA-531 at 3/11/08 9:52 PM:
--
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577711#action_12577711
]
Trustin Lee commented on DIRMINA-535:
-
The difference between sessionCreated and sessi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-539.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M2
Assignee: Trustin Lee
It should be fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-515.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Trustin Lee
It has been fixed. I ran the test in Windows Vist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee updated DIRMINA-536:
Fix Version/s: 1.1.7
1.0.10
Assignee: Trustin Lee
> TextLineDecoder th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trustin Lee resolved DIRMINA-536.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed as you suggested. Please close this issue if it resolves your problem.
40 matches
Mail list logo
