Re: Bumping up dependencies and plugin version

2008-06-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Hopefully, this is a painless modification. Users won't be impacted. I just asked to be sure that no mandatory dependency were selected. I will try to commit the poms later today. Thanks ! Adam Fisk wrote: I say go for it. Continuous integration and all that.. Generally better to migrate so

Re: Bumping up dependencies and plugin version

2008-06-25 Thread Adam Fisk
I say go for it. Continuous integration and all that.. Generally better to migrate sooner than later. -Adam On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have checked the various pom.xml in MINA, FtpServer and AsyncWeb. The > defined dependencies and

Re: Bumping up dependencies and plugin version

2008-06-25 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we migrate ? For those in ftpserver, go ahead. /niklas

Bumping up dependencies and plugin version

2008-06-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Hi, I have checked the various pom.xml in MINA, FtpServer and AsyncWeb. The defined dependencies and plugins are pretty old, we can certainly bump up to the latest version of each one of them. Here is a list of the current used version and the most recent version, tested on my workspace : MI

[jira] Closed: (FTPSERVER-137) Concurrent connections count not decreased on SSL socket close

2008-06-25 Thread Niklas Gustavsson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niklas Gustavsson closed FTPSERVER-137. --- Resolution: Fixed Fixed by caching the remote address that would otherwise be rese

[jira] Commented: (FTPSERVER-137) Concurrent connections count not decreased on SSL socket close

2008-06-25 Thread Niklas Gustavsson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12608049#action_12608049 ] Niklas Gustavsson commented on FTPSERVER-137: - Bug isolated, MINA (or the JR

RE: Asyncweb transport for CXF

2008-06-25 Thread harbhanu
Can anybody point me to a resource with code/explanation about getting the message contents from HTTPRequest obtained from HTTPServiceContext ?? Thanks! Regards, Harbhanu _ From: harbhanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 6:01 PM To: 'dev@mina.apache.org' Cc: '[

[jira] Created: (FTPSERVER-137) Concurrent connections count not decreased on SSL socket close

2008-06-25 Thread Niklas Gustavsson (JIRA)
Concurrent connections count not decreased on SSL socket close -- Key: FTPSERVER-137 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-137 Project: FtpServer Issue Type: Bug

Re: [2.0 refactoring] Reviewing core packages was : [2.0 refactoring] What about splitting mina-core ?

2008-06-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Julien Vermillard wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:16:17 +0200 "Niklas Gustavsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Julien Vermillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Emmanuel for the big commit, everything is compiling fine here. Everybody will need to rename

Re: [2.0 refactoring] Reviewing core packages was : [2.0 refactoring] What about splitting mina-core ?

2008-06-25 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Julien Vermillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, let's do that, anyway I finally deployed a new snapshot. Thanks! /niklas

Re: [2.0 refactoring] Reviewing core packages was : [2.0 refactoring] What about splitting mina-core ?

2008-06-25 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:46:36 +0200 "Niklas Gustavsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Julien Vermillard > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok will try to do it today, > > Thanks! > > > anyway we got a problem ftpserver & > > asyncweb shouldn't depend on MINA snapshot

Re: IoService API Growth

2008-06-25 Thread W.B. Garvelink
Sorry for joining this discussion late, it was held before I joined this list. Back in march/april, consensus was reached on this: On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:54 AM, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 19, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Frédéric Brégier wrote: >> Those numbers are useful in producti

Re: [2.0 refactoring] Reviewing core packages was : [2.0 refactoring] What about splitting mina-core ?

2008-06-25 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Julien Vermillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok will try to do it today, Thanks! > anyway we got a problem ftpserver & > asyncweb shouldn't depend on MINA snapshot but on MX releases for avoid > this kind of problems, when we release next milestone (I suppose it

Re: [2.0 refactoring] Reviewing core packages was : [2.0 refactoring] What about splitting mina-core ?

2008-06-25 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:16:17 +0200 "Niklas Gustavsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Julien Vermillard > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Emmanuel for the big commit, everything is compiling fine > > here. Everybody will need to rename there import in mina 2.0

Re: [2.0 refactoring] Reviewing core packages was : [2.0 refactoring] What about splitting mina-core ?

2008-06-25 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Julien Vermillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Emmanuel for the big commit, everything is compiling fine here. > Everybody will need to rename there import in mina 2.0 apps. Could we publish a new snapshot to the Maven repo? As it stands, FtpServer wont buil