> This is a feature I've used in the past.
>
> Yes, its a very general solution, but when you want to hook into what
> happens when a random exception is thrown, its a lifesaver.
the big problems I see with the implemented somultion are :
- documentation is really misleading. In fact, it's a compl
On Jul 3, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Now, the question is why do we allow a user to define it's own
ExceptionMonitor to handle unhandled exceptions. As we are defining
a framework, it does not make a lot of sense to disregard an
exception and let the user define what to do wi
I think this was something Trustin and I talked about while experimenting
with Monitors verses logging. This was from some concepts that Paul Hammant
was expounding via Pico Container. It was a bad idea then and I think it is
a bad idea now. Not bad rather but just worthless Thoughtworks
masterb
