Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FtpServer 1.0.5, take 2

2010-10-01 Thread Ashish
[X ] +1, release FtpServer 1.0.5 On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > Hi > > I've fixed the bug discovered by Sai and the license header reported > by Emmanuel. New binaries at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-016 > > These are based on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FtpServer 1.0.5, take 2

2010-10-01 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 10/1/10 10:58 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Odd, I get [INFO] Too many unapproved licenses: 13 but when I look at the report I see the same thing you claim. Odd. Not necessarily. However, the way we use rat in FtpServer is a bit basic. If you add : org.codehaus.mojo rat-maven-plugin 1.0-a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FtpServer 1.0.5, take 2

2010-10-01 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Odd, I get [INFO] Too many unapproved licenses: 13 but when I look at the report I see the same thing you claim. Odd. +1 (non-binding) Regards, Alan On Oct 1, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> Rat fails on this release. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FtpServer 1.0.5, take 2

2010-10-01 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Rat fails on this release. The only files I've seen RAT report are the distribution/LICENSE.*.txt files, which should be okay (that said, we should add them to the RAT exclusion list). I just double checked. Did you find anything else? /ni

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FtpServer 1.0.5, take 2

2010-10-01 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Rat fails on this release. Regards, Alan On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > Hi > > I've fixed the bug discovered by Sai and the license header reported > by Emmanuel. New binaries at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-016 > > These are