Re: Configuring a custom UserManager

2010-11-11 Thread John Hartnup
OK, I've explained the issue. I was looking at the 1.1.0 SNAPSHOT source, while running the stable 1.0.5 code. 1.0.5 does not use the dynamically configured CommandFactory for SITE commands. Is there some sort of guesstimate as to when 1.1.0 will become a stable release? On 11 November 2010 14:27

Re: (SSHD-82) Virtual File System

2010-11-11 Thread Guillaume Nodet
That would be awesome. I don't have much time to any real dev on sshd those days, but i'll happily review and apply any patches. On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 17:20, Frank van der Kleij wrote: > > I am finally working on a VFS implementation now. For me it be more practical > if the FileSystemFactory

RE: (SSHD-82) Virtual File System

2010-11-11 Thread Frank van der Kleij
I am finally working on a VFS implementation now. For me it be more practical if the FileSystemFactory would receive the Session instead of just the username. The VFS Authenticator resolves the user name and password and string representing the root of the virtual filesystem and creates a FileO

Re: Configuring a custom UserManager

2010-11-11 Thread John Hartnup
Hi again, On a similar note, I'm having trouble getting a custom SITE command in Apache ftpserver to work. I can see (via logging) that the SITE_PARM object is constructed, but when I send the "site parm" ftp command, I get a 502 error, suggesting that the CommandFactory has not returned th