On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Edouard De Oliveira
wrote:
>
>
> On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
>>
>>
>>> But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some
>>> management bits in the session can swit
Sounds ok
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Hi,
> Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
> dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Julien
Sounds good.
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Hi,
> Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
> dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Julien
On 8/24/11 9:09 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
+1
/niklas
Go ahead
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanu
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
>
>
> On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
>>
>> for mina 3 i indeed was wondering if somehow we could use @ to prevent
>> bloated FSM declaration code and found this in
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
> dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
+1
/niklas
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
>
>
>> But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some
>> management bits in the session can switch on/off some filters why do we want
>> to complicate the coder 's
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
>
>
>> But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some
>> management bits in the session can switch on/off some filters why do we want
>> to complicate the coder 's l
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> wrote:
>> On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
>>>
>>>
But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm
Hi,
Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
WDYT ?
Julien
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
>>
>>
>>> But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm need : as you said some
>>> management bits in the session can switch
12 matches
Mail list logo