Re: [MINA 3] Performances

Two remarks: 1) if the user buffer is a DirectBuffer, I suppose you use it instead of your alllocated DirectBuffer 2) why don't you use always your DirectBuffer when you need to write on the channel ? Regards Jeff On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > I have played a bit

Re: [MINA 3] Performances

Le 1/11/13 9:09 AM, Jeff MAURY a écrit : > Two remarks: > > 1) if the user buffer is a DirectBuffer, I suppose you use it instead of > your alllocated DirectBuffer Yes. > 2) why don't you use always your DirectBuffer when you need to write on the > channel ? This is what is done. Either i use the

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-149) Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Rönisch updated SSHD-149: Attachment: sshd_svndiff svn diff (proposal) - package changed to org.apache.sshd.sftp - ASF headers

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-149) Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551000#comment-13551000 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SSHD-149: -- Your diff does not look right because a few cla

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-149) Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551003#comment-13551003 ] Stefan Rönisch commented on SSHD-149: - I've tried to make the changes you ask for. Pleas

[jira] [Updated] (SSHD-149) Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Rönisch updated SSHD-149: Attachment: svndiff2 The files should be there, now. (First time I use svn diff) > I

[jira] [Work started] (SSHD-205) move ssh-connection (RFC4254) code from sshd.client.* / sshd.server.* to sshd.connection.*

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on SSHD-205 started by Guillaume Nodet. > move ssh-connection (RFC4254) code from sshd.client.* / sshd.server.* to > sshd.connection.* > -

[jira] [Assigned] (SSHD-205) move ssh-connection (RFC4254) code from sshd.client.* / sshd.server.* to sshd.connection.*

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet reassigned SSHD-205: Assignee: Guillaume Nodet > move ssh-connection (RFC4254) code from sshd.client.* / sshd.

[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-922) Add a benchmark project to compare with other IO frameworks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551157#comment-13551157 ] Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-922: --- Patch applied in 2.0.8 and in trun

[jira] [Commented] (SSHD-149) Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551203#comment-13551203 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SSHD-149: -- Thanks, the patch works and compile, but the sf

[jira] [Assigned] (SSHD-149) Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet reassigned SSHD-149: Assignee: Guillaume Nodet > Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible? > --

[jira] [Work started] (SSHD-149) Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on SSHD-149 started by Guillaume Nodet. > Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible? > > >

[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-929) AbstractPollingIoProcessor patch to mark buffer as free

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551265#comment-13551265 ] Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-929: --- Hi, looking at the patch atm (I w

[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-929) AbstractPollingIoProcessor patch to mark buffer as free

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551268#comment-13551268 ] Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-929: --- Patch applied with Commit: 0627d25

[jira] [Resolved] (DIRMINA-929) AbstractPollingIoProcessor patch to mark buffer as free

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRMINA-929. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.8 Patch applied. > Abst

[MINA 3] LDAP codec

Hi ! I did some experiment with the LDAP codec today. It's not exactly easy to check if it can work safely with MINA 3, as it's almost impossible to write a standalone LDAP codec in MINA without doing some huge modifications in the LDAP API code. I think it should be done the other way out : the

Re: So where would I find 2.0.8?

Le 1/12/13 7:05 AM, Mondain a écrit : > Do I need to pull it from Git or is it still available in SVN? Definitively from git. We can't update the site yet to inform people about this, because the site is stored in SVN and the SVN repo has been switched to read-only, but we don't have the site repo

Re: So where would I find 2.0.8?

Thank you! Keep up the great work. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 1/12/13 7:05 AM, Mondain a écrit : > > Do I need to pull it from Git or is it still available in SVN? > Definitively from git. > > We can't update the site yet to inform people about this, because