Le 5/20/13 8:36 AM, Julien Vermillard a écrit :
> Hi !
>
> Would it cause problems for having MINA 3 jdk7 only ?
> The rational is quite simple : multicast udp support is only in jdk7.
>
> I know a lot of people are still running jdk6 or event 5 :) that's why I ask.
Java 6 is EOL since last year. H
The idea of being 7 only is to avoid that ;)
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 5/20/13 8:36 AM, Julien Vermillard a écrit :
>> Hi !
>>
>> Would it cause problems for having MINA 3 jdk7 only ?
>> The rational is quite simple : multicast udp support is only in jdk7.
>>
Le 5/19/13 11:18 PM, Raphaël Barazzutti a écrit :
> Hi all!
Hi Raphaël !
>
> I'm currently working fixing some issues in the delimited module of codec
> and the serialization modules.
>
> Currently some lines in my codes are generating warnings in Sonar.
You are not alone here :) I fixed many wa
Hi,
comments inline
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 5/19/13 11:18 PM, Raphaël Barazzutti a écrit :
>>
>> I'm currently working fixing some issues in the delimited module of codec
>> and the serialization modules.
>>
>> Currently some lines in my codes are generating
Hi guys,
in SslHelper, we do have some code that unwrap the incoming data :
private void processUnwrap(AbstractIoSession session, ByteBuffer
inBuffer) throws SSLException {
// Blind guess : once uncompressed, the resulting buffer will be
3 times bigger
ByteBuffer appBuffer = B
IMHO, developers who will do the jump to MINA 3.0, might also want to
benefit of the cutting-edge features of JDK7.
+1 for MINA 3.0 on JDK7
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> The idea of being 7 only is to avoid that ;)
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Emmanuel Léc
Thanks for all your comments :)
>
> > One more thing :
> >
> > code like
> >
> > return ((input.get() & 0xff) << 24) | ((input.get() &
> > 0xff) << 16) | ((input.get() & 0xff) << 8)
> > | ((input.get() & 0xff));
> >
> > where input is a ByteBuffer can be re
