Re: MINA branch names

Le 06/07/2018 à 23:15, Jonathan Valliere a écrit : > There are no 2.1 releases are there? No, there are none. There is a branch I created, but no release so far. Maybe 3.0 should be reserved for some > incompatible refactor. 3.0 does exist, and we have releases for it, but it's currently sle

Re: MINA branch names

There are no 2.1 releases are there? Maybe 3.0 should be reserved for some incompatible refactor. I know we had a discussion about this before; shouldn’t the major versions numbers have a goal of maintaining compatibility with the entire major number? So moving to 3 from 2 allows us to break bac

Re: MINA branch names

Le 06/07/2018 à 16:29, Jonathan Valliere a écrit : > Any objections to setting up a 2.X branch which serves as the master then > create the explicit numerical branches when releases are done? The 2.0 > used to be the master but now there is 2.1. Just looking to make it easier > to understand.

[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-1078) OrderedThreadPoolExecutor should allow sessions to be prioritized

Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Core >Reporter: Guus der Kinderen >Assignee: Jonathan Valliere >Priority: Minor > Attachments: 20180216.patch, 20180706.patch > > > The functionality provided in {{OrderedThreadPoolExecutor}}

[jira] [Updated] (DIRMINA-1078) OrderedThreadPoolExecutor should allow sessions to be prioritized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guus der Kinderen updated DIRMINA-1078: --- Attachment: 20180706.patch > OrderedThreadPoolExecutor should allow sessions to

[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-1078) OrderedThreadPoolExecutor should allow sessions to be prioritized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16534903#comment-16534903 ] Jonathan Valliere commented on DIRMINA-1078: [~guus.der.kinderen] The patch

MINA branch names

Any objections to setting up a 2.X branch which serves as the master then create the explicit numerical branches when releases are done? The 2.0 used to be the master but now there is 2.1. Just looking to make it easier to understand.

[jira] [Assigned] (DIRMINA-1078) OrderedThreadPoolExecutor should allow sessions to be prioritized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Valliere reassigned DIRMINA-1078: -- Assignee: Jonathan Valliere > OrderedThreadPoolExecutor should allow session

[jira] [Resolved] (SSHD-831) Request new getter methods on port forwarding channel classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Goldstein Lyor resolved SSHD-831. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.1 Thanks for the contribution - [merged with due credi

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SSHD-831) Request new getter methods on port forwarding channel classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16534514#comment-16534514 ] Goldstein Lyor edited comment on SSHD-831 at 7/6/18 7:19 AM: - T