2.0 vs 2.1 is confusing if 2.0 is head. That is why I proposed adding the X
to make it clear that is not a version tag.
Just rename 3 to something else. I thought I had previously suggested
“future”
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 10:14 AM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
>
> On 18/01/2019 23:22, Jonathan
On 18/01/2019 23:22, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
I suggest creating the 2.X branch and continue that as the master for all 2
releases. Tag everything else.
we have a 2.0 branch that is the working branch for 2.0 x releases, and
a 2.1.0 branch for the next iteration (that plus a trunk that is
