dgü created SSHD-1243:
-
Summary: is GitSshdSessionProcess class Git specific?
Key: SSHD-1243
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1243
Project: MINA SSHD
Issue Type: Question
Affects Vers
Have you tried printing the entirety of the contents from the Socket
inbound and compare against what is passed into the SSLEngine to make sure
our buffer combination/management isn’t corrupting the stream?
On Jan 28, 2022 at 7:45:29 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Ok, moving forward:
>
> The te
Ok, moving forward:
The test does:
- create the server and set the SSLFilter with TLS 1.2
- create the secured connection (TLSv1.2)
- write a first message ('test-1')
- that initiate the HS, then the message is written to the server
- once the HS is completed, the response is sent (response 1)
-
🤯
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:30 PM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> It should.
>
> What is really puzzling is when we set the server to use TLS 1.2 *and*
> the client to TLS 1.2, and that fails whatever Java version we use...
>
> On 29/01/2022 00:14, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
> > Shouldn’t it be downgra
It should.
What is really puzzling is when we set the server to use TLS 1.2 *and*
the client to TLS 1.2, and that fails whatever Java version we use...
On 29/01/2022 00:14, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
Shouldn’t it be downgrading during the handshake?
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:12 PM Emmanuel Léc
Shouldn’t it be downgrading during the handshake?
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:12 PM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> after a big fight, I finally found that the SslFilterTest was failing in
> Mina 2.2 with Java 8 and 11 when the client was not set to use TLS V1.3
> (it was set to use "T
Hi Jonathan,
after a big fight, I finally found that the SslFilterTest was failing in
Mina 2.2 with Java 8 and 11 when the client was not set to use TLS V1.3
(it was set to use "TLS"). Note that the client is a plain SSL Socket,
created by a SSLSocketFactory.
So the combinations that work :
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
dgü closed SSHD-1242.
-
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
> Java SPI for remote command execution
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17483935#comment-17483935
]
dgü commented on SSHD-1242:
---
Let me clarify: What I meant is to execute command by a provider(pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17483927#comment-17483927
]
dgü commented on SSHD-1242:
---
I see it is not possible.
What I meant is to execute an executable
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1242 ]
dgü deleted comment on SSHD-1242:
---
was (Author: JIRAUSER284065):
I see it is not possible.
What I meant is to execute an executable command. For example:
SSHRuntimeProvider#exec("ssh://user@host:///tmp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17483925#comment-17483925
]
dgü commented on SSHD-1242:
---
I see it is not possible.
What I meant is to execute an executable
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1242 ]
dgü deleted comment on SSHD-1242:
---
was (Author: JIRAUSER284065):
I see it is not possible.
What I meant is to execute an executable command. For example:
SSHRuntimeProvider#exec("ssh://user@host:///tmp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17483896#comment-17483896
]
Lyor Goldstein commented on SSHD-1242:
--
{quote}SSHRuntimeProvider#exec(java.nio.file.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17483825#comment-17483825
]
dgü commented on SSHD-1242:
---
Hello!
{quote}"Are you asking if there is such a standard API in Ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17483630#comment-17483630
]
Lyor Goldstein commented on SSHD-1242:
--
I agree - this seems the most likely avenue A
16 matches
Mail list logo