I think that a generic interface should be used (As previously stated
Map for example).
>From one side you have a default with each version.
On the other side , if during some time we'll find out that the choice
is not optimal it's an easy switch.
Adding a factory/configuration adds an unneeded com
You can try various scripts using netcat
or simple to write a concurrent client.
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 00:57 +0800, mat wrote:
> No other methods?
>
> 2007/4/21, Thierry Mallard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > mat a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just finished my server. Can anyone provide me a meth
Not quite.
main:
IoAcceptor acceptor = new SocketAcceptor();
SocketAcceptorConfig cfg = new SocketAcceptorConfig();
DemuxingProtocolCodecFactory dpcf=new DemuxingProtocolCodecFactory();
dpcf.register(FirstMessageEncoder.class);
dpcf.register(SecondMessageEncoder.class);
cfg.getFilterChain().addLast
By the way is there a posibility to download sources of 2.0 without svn?
(firewall)
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 15:20 +0100, Rodrigo Madera wrote:
> In my opinion, whichever you choose is fine.
>
> Trustin, what are the plans for 2.0?
> Will it eventually replace 1.x or is it planed to branch independ
