Re: [VOTE] Releasing FtpServer 1.0.1

+1 Julien +1 Sai Pullabhotla www.jMethods.com On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.comwrote: Hey, since 1.0.0 some issues has been reported in FtpServer. Now is therefore a good time to get 1.0.1 out. You can find the binaries and Maven artifacts

Re: About MINA 2.0.0-M4 tarballs

Ok, guys, one of the steps was FU. The assembly pluging is buggy, and the patch proposed on JIRA about it simply does not work anymore : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-616 One more thing we have to fix for 2.0.0-RC1, I guess. Sadly, I don't have time this morning to get this

Re: [Vote] Release MINA 2.0.0-M4

Hi guys, we have released 2.0.0-M3 a few weeks ago (nov, 8th). I think it's time for the last milestone before RC1 now. We still have a few issues to fix (7), but so far, the API won't change now. I would call this release the API freeze release. Once release, we should work on 2.0-RC1,

Re: MINA 1.1.7 MD5 and SHA1 hashes do not match downloads

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, they have to be in sync. Make me realize that I didn't added my key in this file :) I've updated the KEYS file in www.apache.org/dist/mina and added a note to the file to remind future updaters to do the

added o.a.asyncweb.common.codec and Mutable interfaces

Hi, I moved some class related to HTTP message encoding/decoding from o.a.asyncweb.common to o.a.asynweb.common.codec. So there is less crowd in the package. I thought about another simplification : for a simple Http Message you have this heritance tree : DefaultHttpResponse extends

Javadoc commits

Hi, If you are following the commit log, everybody is urging for getting more and more code covered with Javadoc and internal code documentation. Actually there was a couple of files and whole packages commited with *no* javadoc at all or even without licenses headers. We are far of discussing

Re: svn commit: r659372 - /mina/branches/buffer/core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/queue/Default ByteBufferQueue.java

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Emmanuel Lecharny ha scritto: Now, considering your attitude : your are sometime just behaving like a stubborn childish person. You are interpreting the ASF rules at your own advantage, with no respect for person

Re: MINA + Grizzly discussion

Hi, no prob between 7-17 UTC. Julien Either email or IRC works for me. I am EDT (GMT-4). On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:30 PM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just came to think that we might be able to make this discussion occur via e-mail exchange, by cross posting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MINA 1.0.10 and 1.1.7

Hi, We all know it's the current branche code ;) Just checkout and test it ! Julien +1 for the release I also like the idea of specifying the revision number for the releases... Thanks, Sangjin On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:14 AM, ÀÌÈñ½Â (Trustin Lee) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Emmanuel

Re: [Asyncweb][Client] Can we quiet down this logging in the client?

The AHC seems to be logging profusely. Could we reduce that output? I was going to throw a log4j.properties file into the test/resources area but seems like the project is using another logger. Alex Hi Alex, the server is quite INFO verbose too, a lot of logging statement need to be

Re: [AsyncHttpClient] On bringing the code bases and communities together

Hi, Just so I understand... What is the direction we're taking? Just for the terminology sake, I'll call these versions - g-ahc-v1: Geronimo AHC based on Mina 1.1 (the one that Rick and I were working on) - g-ahc-v2: Geronimo AHC based on Mina trunk - mina-ahc: Mina AHC that was

Re: [AsyncHttpClient] On bringing the code bases and communities together

sorry for double post,I'm out of my office and using webmail which is really bugged :( Sorry for the inconvenience, Julien

Re: [AsyncHttpClient] On bringing the code bases and communities together

Hi Just so I understand... What is the direction we're taking? Just for the terminology sake, I'll call these versions - g-ahc-v1: Geronimo AHC based on Mina 1.1 (the one that Rick and I were working on). - g-ahc-v2: Geronimo AHC based on Mina trunk - mina-ahc: Mina AHC that was

Re: Any thoughts on this new network library

Wondering if anyone used or tried this library here: http://xsocket.sourceforge.net/ Someone pointed me over to it and I have not had any time to take a closer look. Thanks, Alex Hi, it's not really new, it's perhaps as old as MINA. Take a look at the tutorial :