Re: [PR] Bump io.netty:netty-bom from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.4.Final [mina-sshd]

2025-09-04 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #802: Bump io.netty:netty-bom from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.4.Final URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/802 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to th

[PR] Bump io.netty:netty-bom from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.5.Final [mina-sshd]

2025-09-04 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #810: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/810 Bumps [io.netty:netty-bom](https://github.com/netty/netty) from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.5.Final. Commits https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/406a58fd36e351b299553b3ceba5708f40a6153d"

Re: [PR] Bump io.netty:netty-bom from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.4.Final [mina-sshd]

2025-09-04 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #802: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/802#issuecomment-3253553940 Superseded by #810. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific co

Re: [I] how to set apache mina sshd io thread count? [mina-sshd]

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #518: how to set apache mina sshd io thread count? URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/518 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: [I] Adding Project Loom Support [mina-sshd]

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #480: Adding Project Loom Support URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/480 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: [I] Regression in SftpInputStreamAsync: NullPointerException when downloading large files in versions >= 2.13.1 [mina-sshd]

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #763: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/763#issuecomment-3244327004 Since no response: closing as duplicate of #733. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL ab

Re: [I] Plan SSHD 3.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #564: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/564#issuecomment-3243943629 I'm closing this. The 3.0.0 development is on-going, and this issue to plan it is no longer helpful. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to th

Re: [I] ssh packet size 32kb to 64kb possible? ... [mina-sshd]

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #749: ssh packet size 32kb to 64kb possible? ... URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/749 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To u

Re: [I] SSH for power shell support [mina-sshd]

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #523: SSH for power shell support URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/523 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: [I] Regression in SftpInputStreamAsync: NullPointerException when downloading large files in versions >= 2.13.1 [mina-sshd]

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #763: Regression in SftpInputStreamAsync: NullPointerException when downloading large files in versions >= 2.13.1 URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/763 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

Re: [I] SSH for power shell support [mina-sshd]

2025-09-01 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #523: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/523#issuecomment-3243999413 If you start a background job (whether on Linux or Windows), you probably have to make the remote shell wait for that job to finish. Otherwise the remote shell terminates while the

Re: [I] Restricting User Access to Specific Directories in Apache SSHD SFTP Server [mina-sshd]

2025-09-01 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #534: Restricting User Access to Specific Directories in Apache SSHD SFTP Server URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/534 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

Re: [I] Plan SSHD 3.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-09-01 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #564: Plan SSHD 3.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/564 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

Re: [I] Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD v3(3.0.0) Release [mina-sshd]

2025-08-31 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #797: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/797#issuecomment-3239922711 I've prepared a 3.0.0-M1 milestone pre-release; it is now in the voting phase: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@mina.apache.org/msg43007.html -- This is an automated message fro

Re: [I] Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD v3(3.0.0) Release [mina-sshd]

2025-08-31 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #797: Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD v3(3.0.0) Release URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/797 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: [PR] Fix server-side authentication with FIDO/U2F sk-* keys [mina-sshd]

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #809: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/809 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

[PR] Fix server-side authentication with FIDO/U2F sk-* keys [mina-sshd]

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #809: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/809 Respect server-side attributes that may be set in an `authorized_keys` file: `no-touch-required` and `verify-required`. These flags exist _only_ server-side; the public keys received in an SSH_MSG_U

Re: [I] Ed25519-SK keys are not fully supported (with hardware keys) [mina-sshd]

2025-08-25 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #807: Ed25519-SK keys are not fully supported (with hardware keys) URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/807 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the spec

Re: [PR] GH-807: Handle "verified" flag for sk-* keys [mina-sshd]

2025-08-25 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #808: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/808 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

[PR] GH-807: Handle "verified" flag for sk-* keys [mina-sshd]

2025-08-25 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #808: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/808 Parse the "verify_required" flag from authorized_keys and set it on the keys; add a getter. When checking the signature, also check the "verified" flag if "verified-required" is set. Fixes #8

Re: [I] SK-ED25519 keys are not fully supported [mina-sshd]

2025-08-25 Thread via GitHub
noxvost commented on issue #807: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/807#issuecomment-3220511774 According to specs https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Authentication_API/Authenticator_data this is because of "-O verify-required" ``` Bit 2, User Veri

[I] SK-ED25519 keys are not fully supported [mina-sshd]

2025-08-25 Thread via GitHub
noxvost opened a new issue, #807: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/807 ### Version 2.15 ### Bug description When client with hardware key (YubiKey 5) with Ed25519 key connects to Mina SSH server, the key fails to pass verification. The key was gener

Re: [PR] Client sent empty ssh package to keep connection issue [mina-sshd]

2025-08-25 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed pull request #804: Client sent empty ssh package to keep connection issue URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/804 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the speci

Re: [PR] Skip container tests if docker is not available [mina-sshd]

2025-08-23 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #806: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/806 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

[PR] Skip container tests if docker is not available [mina-sshd]

2025-08-23 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf opened a new pull request, #806: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/806 Skip all container tests if no docker engine is running. Remove disabling the tests on Windows: also run these tests on Windows if a docker engine is available. (The CI Windows runners don't have do

[PR] Bump org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver from 4.10.0 to 4.10.1 [mina-sshd]

2025-08-21 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #805: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/805 Bumps [org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver](https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-archiver) from 4.10.0 to 4.10.1. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/p

Re: [PR] Client sent empty ssh package to keep connection issue [mina-sshd]

2025-08-20 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on PR #804: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/804#issuecomment-3204740480 This doesn't make sense. You can't stop clients from sending SSH_MSG_IGNORE packets. There are already mechanisms in place that enable you to control how your server handles these messa

[PR] Client sent empty ssh package to keep connection issue [mina-sshd]

2025-08-20 Thread via GitHub
Main-Tomi opened a new pull request, #804: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/804 I use sshd family libs(version: 2.14.0) to run a sftp server. But many clients send some empty_ssh_packages to keep the connection. Based on our business requirements, we do not wish to maintain

Re: [I] incorrect classloading of SecurityProviders [mina-sshd]

2025-08-19 Thread via GitHub
jansohn commented on issue #502: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/502#issuecomment-3199957475 My (ugly) workaround for now which I execute during initialization phase of my web application: ```java if (Security.getProvider(SecurityUtils.BOUNCY_CASTLE) != null) {

Re: [I] Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD 2.16.0 release [mina-sshd]

2025-08-18 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #801: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/801#issuecomment-3198510724 Release 2.16.0 is in the voting phase. See https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@mina.apache.org/msg42975.html . -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respon

Re: [I] Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD 2.16.0 release [mina-sshd]

2025-08-18 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #801: Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD 2.16.0 release URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/801 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. T

Re: [I] incorrect classloading of SecurityProviders [mina-sshd]

2025-08-18 Thread via GitHub
jansohn commented on issue #502: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/502#issuecomment-3196612577 seeing something quite similar when re-deploying my web application in Tomcat (without restarting Tomcat): ``` Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java/security/spec

Re: [I] Support mlkem768x25519-sha256 algorithm with JDK 24 [mina-sshd]

2025-08-15 Thread via GitHub
mattrpav commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/803#issuecomment-3192366502 @tomaswolf sounds good. You may checkout the approach I did for ActiveMQ client library. We start with a source jar, extracting the contents to another module and then have only the

Re: [I] Support mlkem768x25519-sha256 algorithm with JDK 24 [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/803#issuecomment-3190770685 I don't have the time to do that in the 2.x.0 versions. Maybe in the 3.0 branch, but don't hold your breath. (Needs multi-version jars since we still support Java 8, but I want to

Re: [I] Support mlkem768x25519-sha256 algorithm with JDK 24 [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
mattrpav commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/803#issuecomment-3190221938 Current impl requires bouncy castle. JDK 24 will provide the algorithm as well -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the messag

Re: [I] Support mlkem768x25519-sha256 algorithm [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
mattrpav commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/803#issuecomment-3190194742 I missed it! Thanks -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific com

Re: [I] Support mlkem768x25519-sha256 algorithm [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
mattrpav closed issue #803: Support mlkem768x25519-sha256 algorithm URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/803 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsub

Re: [I] how to implement "SftpFileSystemAccessor" for a virtual filesystem? [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
EnderCrypt commented on issue #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/800#issuecomment-3189751618 @tomaswolf the code was merely meant as a minimal reproducible example, and is not actually my project. regardless, your advice to use a custom Path implementation was corre

Re: [I] how to implement "SftpFileSystemAccessor" for a virtual filesystem? [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
EnderCrypt closed issue #800: how to implement "SftpFileSystemAccessor" for a virtual filesystem? URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/800 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: [I] Support mlkem768x25519-sha256 algorithm [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/803#issuecomment-3189398279 I don't understand. We do support this hybrid PQC algorithm since version 2.15.0, commit 38bb2c619. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[I] Support mlkem768x25519-sha256 algorithm [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
mattrpav opened a new issue, #803: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/803 ### Description Support ssh algorithm mlkem768x25519-sha256 ### Motivation OpenSSH 10 will default to mlkem768x25519-sha256, so it would be great for Apache Mina SSHD to start mak

Re: [PR] Bump io.netty:netty-bom from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.3.Final [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #770: Bump io.netty:netty-bom from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.3.Final URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/770 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to th

Re: [PR] Bump io.netty:netty-bom from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.3.Final [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #770: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/770#issuecomment-3188115020 Superseded by #802. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific co

[PR] Bump io.netty:netty-bom from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.4.Final [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #802: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/802 Bumps [io.netty:netty-bom](https://github.com/netty/netty) from 4.2.0.Final to 4.2.4.Final. Commits https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/7fefa5a9d6f2bf41b6b304cfe26b2e193d8f326a"

Re: [I] how to implement "SftpFileSystemAccessor" for a virtual filesystem? [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/800#issuecomment-3188109732 I can't help debug your code. Note that a file system goes together with a `Path` implementation. If you return paths from the native file system (like `Path.of("/")`), you g

Re: [I] how to implement "SftpFileSystemAccessor" for a virtual filesystem? [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
EnderCrypt commented on issue #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/800#issuecomment-3187994229 thank you for the quick response @tomaswolf yes from the documentation i had mistakenly assumed SftpFileSystemAccessor to be what i needed. i created a FileSystemFac

Re: [I] SSHd user certificate support in a 2.15.1 version [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #765: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/765#issuecomment-3187583158 See #801. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [I] SSHd user certificate support in a 2.15.1 version [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #765: SSHd user certificate support in a 2.15.1 version URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/765 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment

Re: [I] Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD 2.16.0 release [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #801: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/801#issuecomment-3187575628 There is no timeline. I've asked on the mailing list, but note that it's vacation season, so it might take a while. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. T

Re: [I] how to implement "SftpFileSystemAccessor" for a virtual filesystem? [mina-sshd]

2025-08-14 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/800#issuecomment-3187565436 Not sure I understand. `sshfs` should use normal SFTP, so you'd just have an SFTP server with your in-memory filesystem, and you'd just configure your SFTP subsystem with an approp

[I] Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD 2.16.0 release [mina-sshd]

2025-08-13 Thread via GitHub
seeseemelk opened a new issue, #801: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/801 Hi, Is there a timeline for when a new minor version release of MINA SSHD could be released? We're hoping to have some of the bug fixes (most notably #775) that are currently in master without ha

[I] how to implement "SftpFileSystemAccessor" for a virtual filesystem? [mina-sshd]

2025-08-13 Thread via GitHub
EnderCrypt opened a new issue, #800: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/800 Good day i have a virtual in memory filesystem which i want to make available via `sshfs` im implementing SftpFileSystemAccessor and overriding default methods i have tried providing a c

[PR] Bump org.apache.maven:maven-archiver from 3.6.3 to 3.6.4 [mina-sshd]

2025-08-12 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #799: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/799 Bumps [org.apache.maven:maven-archiver](https://github.com/apache/maven-archiver) from 3.6.3 to 3.6.4. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/apache/maven-archiver/releases";>

[PR] Bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.27.3 to 3.27.4 [mina-sshd]

2025-08-08 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #798: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/798 Bumps [org.assertj:assertj-core](https://github.com/assertj/assertj) from 3.27.3 to 3.27.4. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/assertj/assertj/releases";>org.assertj:assert

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-08-04 Thread via GitHub
gencywinter commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3150795443 > And what would we get: in a few very special cases (like yours) > Any such implementation would affect basically all the layers in the code. Testing this would be a nigh

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-08-02 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #791: ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-08-02 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3146482608 > and then maybe find a solution Thought some more about that. We have a server that doesn't respect the SSH protocol and that closes the connection prematurely. The current

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-07-31 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3141014489 Thinking more about this: it appears your server does not close the channel properly. This is normally a handshake, but if the server doesn't follow that protocol, weird things may

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-07-31 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3140460238 You don't know what the server is, but you send it commands? That's strange, to say the least. ;-) Anyway: so you open a shell and you then transfer data by dumping some data

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-07-31 Thread via GitHub
gencywinter commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3140311482 Sorry. I just want to discuss whether there are any solutions for this usage. It's just CLI. It's only Client, Apache Mina Sshd 2.10.0 - 2.13.0, Linux. I do not kn

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-07-31 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3139964088 Sorry, with the tidbits so far in this issue we cannot do anything. - Is the client an Apache MINA sshd client? If so: which version, which platform? If not, what is it? -

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-07-31 Thread via GitHub
gencywinter commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3139684895 > It is not clear to me from all of the above which logs are client and which are server logs. All logs are client. > So: why was the server session closed? I send a

Re: [PR] Bump grpc.version from 1.73.0 to 1.74.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-30 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #792: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/792 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

Re: [PR] Trigger ClientChannelEvent.Timeout and ClientSessionEvent.TIMEOUT independently to host's program cycle times [mina-sshd]

2025-07-30 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on PR #790: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/790#issuecomment-3137009040 Thank you for this fix. The old code looks like someone put in some placeholder code and forgot to clean up later. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To resp

Re: [PR] Trigger ClientChannelEvent.Timeout and ClientSessionEvent.TIMEOUT independently to host's program cycle times [mina-sshd]

2025-07-30 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #790: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/790 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-07-30 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3136736722 It is not clear to me from all of the above which logs are client and which are server logs. If the servers sends a [FIN, ACK] that's probably when it closes its server sess

Re: [I] Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD v3(3.0.0) Release [mina-sshd]

2025-07-30 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #797: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/797#issuecomment-3136642568 No, I cannot. There's a lot more to do for 3.0, and resources are limited. I do hope to publish a few milestone releases (3.0.0-M1 could be what is currently in the dev_3.0 branch)

[I] Timelines for Apache MINA SSHD v3(3.0.0) Release [mina-sshd]

2025-07-30 Thread via GitHub
jeetu22 opened a new issue, #797: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/797 Hi Team/ @tomaswolf We are currently migrating from **com.github.mwiede/jsch:2.27.0 to Apache MINA 2.15.0** and are encountering issues while configuring proxy support. Our application requires HT

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-07-30 Thread via GitHub
gencywinter commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3136087977 > When Broken pipe occurs, it actually means that the data has already been transmitted. I'm sorry, there's a bit of an issue with the wording here. > Why? Broken pi

Re: [I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-07-30 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791#issuecomment-3135395218 > When Broken pipe occurs, it actually means that the data has already been transmitted. Why? Broken pipe just means the other end went away. The stack trace shows a b

Re: [I] Damsenorrison [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #796: Damsenorrison URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/796 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

[I] Damsenorrison [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
dafakualf43338 opened a new issue, #796: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/796 ### Description Pop-imap-pap Re-run bugfixes+intuit bags,B4 rex - sol ar out (return:space: space : semi- colon walker ### Motivation Exercise the mind without trips o

Re: [I] JGit 5.13.3 Client no longer connecting to SSH Git Server 2.12+ [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
kwin commented on issue #795: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/795#issuecomment-3133461296 This seems to have been caused by a classpath version conflict of sshd-osgi 2.7.0 (being used by JGit) and sshd-common-2.15.0 as both contain `org.apache.sshd.common.util`. -- This i

Re: [I] JGit 5.13.3 Client no longer connecting to SSH Git Server 2.12+ [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
kwin closed issue #795: JGit 5.13.3 Client no longer connecting to SSH Git Server 2.12+ URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/795 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specif

[I] JGit 5.13.3 Client no longer connecting to SSH Git Server 2.12+ [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
kwin opened a new issue, #795: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/795 ### Version 2.12.0 ### Bug description With SSHD 2.11.0 we used a test SSH server which worked fine with our JGit 5.13.3 based client (https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/blob/master/mave

Re: [I] GitPackCommand opens Repository without closing it [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf closed issue #793: GitPackCommand opens Repository without closing it URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/793 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific commen

Re: [PR] Close repository after usage in GitPackCommand [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #794: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/794 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

Re: [I] GitPackCommand opens Repository without closing it [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/793#issuecomment-3132831424 I'm not disputing that at all, just pointing out another potential problem with deleting git repositories. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [I] GitPackCommand opens Repository without closing it [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
kwin commented on issue #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/793#issuecomment-3132744323 I used `java.io.File` API which till recently also worked on read-only files (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8355954). Still I faced the issue, so I think this is really about cach

Re: [I] GitPackCommand opens Repository without closing it [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf commented on issue #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/793#issuecomment-3132660686 Note that pack files in git are also read-only, which may give trouble deleting them on Windows. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the m

[PR] Close repository after usage in GitPackCommand [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
kwin opened a new pull request, #794: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/794 This closes #793 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-m

[I] GitPackCommand opens Repository without closing it [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
kwin opened a new issue, #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/793 ### Version 2.15.1-SNAPSHOT ### Bug description The GitPackCommand opens a repository in https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/67e2e4c7482eabfa73303f728ec1d702f81847cf/sshd-git/src/main

[PR] Bump grpc.version from 1.73.0 to 1.74.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #792: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/792 Bumps `grpc.version` from 1.73.0 to 1.74.0. Updates `io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded` from 1.73.0 to 1.74.0 Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/releases";>io.grpc

[I] ClientSessionImpl can continue reading the Unread Packet after 'IOException: Broken pipe' occurs. [mina-sshd]

2025-07-28 Thread via GitHub
gencywinter opened a new issue, #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/791 ### Description When Nio2Session writes data through handleWriteCycleFailure, a java.io.IOException: Broken pipe occurs. Immediately following this, a series of Close actions are initiated. Howe

Re: [PR] Bump pmd.version from 7.15.0 to 7.16.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-27 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #788: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/788 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

Re: [PR] Bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.40.0 to 2.41.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-27 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #789: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/789 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

[PR] AbstractClientChannel@waitFor calculate `remWait` with passed milliseconds [mina-sshd]

2025-07-27 Thread via GitHub
fersaru opened a new pull request, #790: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/790 On some hosts, on which waiting for the `futureLock.wait(remWait)` is faster than 1 millisecond, `remWait` gets reduced by 123 milliseconds although not even one passed. This causes a `ClientChanne

[PR] Bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.40.0 to 2.41.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-25 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #789: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/789 Bumps [com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core](https://github.com/google/error-prone) from 2.40.0 to 2.41.0. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/google/error-prone/releases

[PR] Bump pmd.version from 7.15.0 to 7.16.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-25 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #788: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/788 Bumps `pmd.version` from 7.15.0 to 7.16.0. Updates `net.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-core` from 7.15.0 to 7.16.0 Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/pmd/pmd/releases";>net.sourcefo

Re: [PR] Bump org.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin from 3.6.0 to 3.6.1 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-24 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #787: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/787 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

[PR] Bump org.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin from 3.6.0 to 3.6.1 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-24 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #787: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/787 Bumps [org.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin](https://github.com/mojohaus/build-helper-maven-plugin) from 3.6.0 to 3.6.1. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/mojohaus

Re: [I] WritePendingException when writing file [mina-sshd]

2025-07-24 Thread via GitHub
seeseemelk commented on issue #774: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/774#issuecomment-3112945410 I can confirm that this does indeed fix the issue. Do you know when a new version containing this patch will be released? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser

Re: [PR] Bump net.revelc.code.formatter:formatter-maven-plugin from 2.26.0 to 2.27.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #786: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/786 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

Re: [PR] Bump org.owasp:dependency-check-maven from 12.1.1 to 12.1.3 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #785: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/785 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

Re: [PR] Bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.40.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
tomaswolf merged PR #784: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/784 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.

[PR] Bump net.revelc.code.formatter:formatter-maven-plugin from 2.26.0 to 2.27.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #786: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/786 Bumps net.revelc.code.formatter:formatter-maven-plugin from 2.26.0 to 2.27.0. [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?de

[PR] Bump org.springframework.integration:spring-integration-bom from 5.5.7 to 6.5.1 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #783: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/783 Bumps [org.springframework.integration:spring-integration-bom](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-integration) from 5.5.7 to 6.5.1. Release notes Sourced from https://github.c

[PR] Bump org.owasp:dependency-check-maven from 12.1.1 to 12.1.3 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #785: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/785 Bumps [org.owasp:dependency-check-maven](https://github.com/dependency-check/DependencyCheck) from 12.1.1 to 12.1.3. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/dependency-check/De

[PR] Bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.40.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #784: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/784 Bumps [com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core](https://github.com/google/error-prone) from 2.38.0 to 2.40.0. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/google/error-prone/releases

Re: [PR] Bump org.springframework.integration:spring-integration-bom from 5.5.7 to 6.5.0 [mina-sshd]

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #755: Bump org.springframework.integration:spring-integration-bom from 5.5.7 to 6.5.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/755 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >