Hi!
I'm closing this vote with 4 binding +1 and one ,on binding +1:
Binding
- Jonathan
- Jeff Genender
- Guillaume
- and me
Non Binding:
- Chistoph.
Thanks for the votes, I'll push the packages and announce the release ASAP !
On 20/07/2022 15:41, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
hi!
This is a v
+1
On 20.07.22 16:33, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
Le mer. 20 juil. 2022 à 15:42, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
hi!
This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1.
This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a
missing comma made MINA 2.2.0 impossible to use by application that
levera
+1
Le mer. 20 juil. 2022 à 15:42, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
> hi!
>
>
> This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1.
>
> This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a
> missing comma made MINA 2.2.0 impossible to use by application that
> leverage OSGi, due to a concatenation of pac
+1
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:46 AM Jeff Genender wrote:
> +1
>
> Jeff
>
> > On Jul 20, 2022, at 7:41 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
> >
> > hi!
> >
> >
> > This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1.
> >
> > This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a
> missing comma made MINA 2.2
+1
Jeff
> On Jul 20, 2022, at 7:41 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> hi!
>
>
> This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1.
>
> This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a
> missing comma made MINA 2.2.0 impossible to use by application that leverage
> OSGi, due to a concatenat
hi!
This is a vote for MINA 2.2.1.
This version just fixes an issue in the export declaration for OSGi: a
missing comma made MINA 2.2.0 impossible to use by application that
leverage OSGi, due to a concatenation of package name.
A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the vo
