Result, was : [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

Hi guys, I'm closing the vote, with 4 +1 binding votes and one non binding vote. I'll push the packages and make an announcement asap. Note that we will certainly have to cut a new release, because a new serious issue has been found in the SSLHandler class, although I don't think we should wait

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Ashish wrote: > +1 > > Build works fine, all test cases passing > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina :

[VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

Hi, Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. This release fixed a serious issue in the IoProcessor loop, that may lead in some cases to a 100% CPU consumption. It also fixes the IoProcessor loop exit conditions. Another two bugs found by Radovan Semancik has been

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

+1 Jeff On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > +1 > > Jeff > > > On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:21 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. > > > > This release fixed a

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

+1 Jeff > On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:21 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. > > This release fixed a serious issue in the IoProcessor loop, that may lead in > some cases to a 100% CPU consumption. > It

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.12 release, take 2

+1 Build works fine, all test cases passing On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Hi, > > Here is another vote for a new bug fix release of Mina : 2.0.12. > > This release fixed a serious issue in the IoProcessor loop, that may lead in > some cases to