Re: [Vysper] XML parser in a separate module?

2009-11-23 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Bernd Fondermann bf_...@brainlounge.de wrote: However, wearing my XMPP-shutter-glasses, I like to add that Vysper itself would not profit from extending it to parse more XML. Vysper needs fast fail, where any XML not supported by XMPP

Re: [Vysper] XML parser in a separate module?

2009-11-22 Thread Bernd Fondermann
there, I'm thinking of breaking out the XML parser in Vysper into a separate module (still within the Vysper subproject, but with it's own JAR). Thus, it would have no dependencies on Vysper. In the long run, we might also provide a way to remove the current limitations on what XML features

Re: [Vysper] XML parser in a separate module?

2009-11-22 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Bernd Fondermann bf_...@brainlounge.de wrote: However, wearing my XMPP-shutter-glasses, I like to add that Vysper itself would not profit from extending it to parse more XML. Vysper needs fast fail, where any XML not supported by XMPP leads to an immediate

[Vysper] XML parser in a separate module?

2009-11-11 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
Hi Since there has been some interest here on using XML decoders with MINA, and the inherit problems with doing this with the standard XML parsers out there, I'm thinking of breaking out the XML parser in Vysper into a separate module (still within the Vysper subproject, but with it's own JAR

Re: [Vysper] XML parser in a separate module?

2009-11-11 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Hi Since there has been some interest here on using XML decoders with MINA, and the inherit problems with doing this with the standard XML parsers out there, I'm thinking of breaking out the XML parser in Vysper into a separate module (still within the Vysper subproject

Re: [Vysper] XML parser in a separate module?

2009-11-11 Thread Ashish
of breaking out the XML parser in Vysper into a separate module (still within the Vysper subproject, but with it's own JAR). Thus, it would have no dependencies on Vysper. In the long run, we might also provide a way to remove the current limitations on what XML features are supported