Hi Emmanuel, thanks for that info.
Yeah … I was referring to that vote. And especially all the mention of “drama” in that thread. So, this round I simply had a look at the so-far last successful vote thread of all projects I reviewed, as I noticed some projects were not quite following policy. I didn’t check all releases, so certainly it might have coincidentally picked a special case. No worries about that and the newer VOTE threads look a lot healthier. Chris Von: Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> Datum: Montag, 23. Oktober 2023 um 11:03 An: bo...@apache.org <bo...@apache.org>, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>, dev@mina.apache.org <dev@mina.apache.org> Betreff: Re: Personal Feedback to your last board report Hi Christofer, I presule you aere referring to Result, was: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases ? I have added the number of binding votes, and alas, this time, I forgot to mention who voted, something I usually do... Please let me know, and in any case, we will try to not forget to mention the voters' name! Thanks for your feedback! On 21/10/2023 16:27, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > while reviewing your projects as part of me reviewing your last bord > report, I noticed that the last vote seems to have slightly gone off the > rails. > > For me it was hard to see who voted and how many people voted how. > > Maybe taking discussions to a parallel [DISCUSS] thread could help keep > things clean in the vote thread? > > In the future, could you please post a “[RESULT][VOTE]” email? > > I hope the project was able to resolve the disagreements. > > Thanks, > > Chris > -- *Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61 elecha...@apache.org