Yes, Rich. That is what I meant, the Io* and IO*, the Http* and HTTP*,
the Ssl and SSL, the Mdc* and MDC* and etc
Should there really a rule that say, capitalize every letter of the
abbreviation?
Well, of course this is very minor finding and we could leave it as it is :-)
On 9/17/07, Richard
IMHO, IO should never have been Io in the first place.
On 9/16/07, Pat Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trustin Lee wrote:
> > We are seeing too many Io* these days. Should we just drop it? It
> > might cause some confusion, but it might be rather fine.
>
> I'd go for removing it, Mina is
Trustin Lee wrote:
We are seeing too many Io* these days. Should we just drop it? It
might cause some confusion, but it might be rather fine.
I'd go for removing it, Mina is about IO, its kinda silly to talk about
the IO parts of an IO package. Just IMHO
--
Pat Farrell
On 9/17/07, Richard Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't that imply that all the Io* classes and interfaces (IoAcceptor,
> IoConnector, IoEvent, etc.), should all be renamed to IO* for
> consistency? I think that's what Hezjing was pointing to in terms of
> inconsistencies.
We are seeing
Yes, you may be right, Rich.
On 9/16/07, Richard Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't that imply that all the Io* classes and interfaces (IoAcceptor,
> IoConnector, IoEvent, etc.), should all be renamed to IO* for
> consistency? I think that's what Hezjing was pointing to in terms of
> i
Good point.
On 9/16/07, Richard Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Doesn't that imply that all the Io* classes and interfaces (IoAcceptor,
> IoConnector, IoEvent, etc.), should all be renamed to IO* for
> consistency? I think that's what Hezjing was pointing to in terms of
> inconsistencies.
Doesn't that imply that all the Io* classes and interfaces (IoAcceptor,
IoConnector, IoEvent, etc.), should all be renamed to IO* for
consistency? I think that's what Hezjing was pointing to in terms of
inconsistencies.
Rich
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Classes using SSL, IO, NIO, make sense to
Classes using SSL, IO, NIO, make sense to me. It's much more easier to
know what they are doing than by using Ssl, Io or NIO.
The Java standard rules say that the first letter of a noun shiuld be
upcased, but SSL is not a noun, just the 3 first letters of Secure
Socket Layer.
My 2cts.
On 9/16/07
Hi!
I notice that there are inconsistencies in the class names.
Some classes capitalized the abbreviation, but some do not.
For example, I see that there is RuntimeIOException, SSLFilter and NIOSession,
should these be written as RuntimeIoException, SslFilter and NioSession instead?
On 9/15/07
On Sep 14, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Maarten Bosteels wrote:
Does anyone have a MINA-code-style config for IDEA ?
Or am I the only IDEA addict ?
Maybe the default style corresponds to the MINA style, I'd have to
check
that.
You're not alone!
Its very close to the default, with a few tweaks. I'll e
Trustin,
I would recommend you to set up a Subversion commit hook that verifies that
every source file is compatible to the formatting rules specified.
I saw a couple of examples of how to do this a couple of years ago. I
haven't yet implemented it here because we recently switched to mostly Java
On 9/15/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just updated filter-codec-http and protocol-http-client to meet the MINA
> guidelines.
Thanks, Mark! :)
Cheers,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
I just updated filter-codec-http and protocol-http-client to meet the MINA
guidelines.
--
..Cheers
Mark
On 9/14/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, it's up to date.
>
> Trustin
>
> On 9/14/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is the latest coding convention guidlines up to dat
Yes, it's up to date.
Trustin
On 9/14/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the latest coding convention guidlines up to date ?
>
> http://mina.apache.org/developer-guide.html#DeveloperGuide-CodingConvention
>
>
> --
> ..Cheers
> Mark
>
> On 9/14/07, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the latest coding convention guidlines up to date ?
http://mina.apache.org/developer-guide.html#DeveloperGuide-CodingConvention
--
..Cheers
Mark
On 9/14/07, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have a MINA-code-style config for IDEA ?
> Or am I the only IDEA a
Hi,
Does anyone have a MINA-code-style config for IDEA ?
Or am I the only IDEA addict ?
Maybe the default style corresponds to the MINA style, I'd have to check
that.
Maarten
On 9/14/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi committers,
>
> It seems like old coding style has sneaked int
Hi committers,
It seems like old coding style has sneaked into our source code
repository. I didn't run automatic formatter, but please fix them as
soon as you find any of them.
Thanks,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255E
17 matches
Mail list logo
