AW: Executor thread no---signature

Hi! > Steve Johns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don't agree with your answer.If there are idle 5 threads in the pool, > 2 > incoming same session's events will be executed one after another? I > think > you have to synchronize the your business logic if it is neccessary. Correct me if I

Re: Executor thread no---signature

I don't agree with your answer.If there are idle 5 threads in the pool, 2 incoming same session's events will be executed one after another? I think you have to synchronize the your business logic if it is neccessary. On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Steve Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi!

Re: Executor thread no---signature

Hi! There's a thread pool, which means that there isn't a thread for each session. But the session's events are executed one-after-another, so you don't have to care about synchronzing as long as you stay in a session's context. regards Steve > Alex _ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi >

Re: Executor thread

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Alex _ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > how does the executor filterchain work? is each session in its own thread > or is each event within a session in its own thread? Or something else? This > is for mina 2M3 Guess you're talking about ExecutorFilter - so yes

Executor thread

Hi how does the executor filterchain work? is each session in its own thread or is each event within a session in its own thread? Or something else? This is for mina 2M3