Hi,
Agreeing with jeff, you can't complain of the lack of an accessor, when you
just voided the attachment ;)
I really wonder what JDK guys have in mind with AIO, it's far of being a
slick API, it doesn't support UDP (you need to mix AIO and NIO if you want
to support TCP and UDP) and I can't see
forwarding to the correct ML
-- Forwarded message --
From: Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com
Date: Mar 2, 2013 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Interesting post about AIO
To: Apache Directory Developers List d...@directory.apache.org
Le 3/2/13 9:10 AM, Julien Vermillard a écrit :
Hi
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 3/2/13 9:10 AM, Julien Vermillard a écrit :
Hi,
Agreeing with jeff, you can't complain of the lack of an accessor, when
you
just voided the attachment ;)
Again, this is not the interesting part n this
Le 3/2/13 1:23 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 3/2/13 9:10 AM, Julien Vermillard a écrit :
Hi,
Agreeing with jeff, you can't complain of the lack of an accessor, when
you
just voided the attachment ;)
Again, this is
post about AIO
To: Apache Directory Developers List d...@directory.apache.org
Le 3/2/13 9:10 AM, Julien Vermillard a écrit :
Hi,
Agreeing with jeff, you can't complain of the lack of an accessor, when
you
just voided the attachment ;)
Again, this is not the interesting part n this article
Le 2 mars 2013 12:46, Kiran Ayyagari kayyag...@apache.org a écrit :
forwarding to the correct ML
-- Forwarded message --
From: Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com
Date: Mar 2, 2013 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Interesting post about AIO
To: Apache Directory Developers List d
Le 3/2/13 7:01 PM, Christian Schwarz a écrit :
Maybe this is an interesting read about AIO too. Its written by one of the
jetty developers.
http://webtide.intalio.com/2013/02/on-jdk-7-asynchronous-io/
Hmmm, this is the exact link that started this discussion :-)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Hi guys,
this is worth reading :
http://webtide.intalio.com/2013/02/on-jdk-7-asynchronous-io/
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
I don't quite follow his arguments because this is easily fixed by either
using an anonymous class or a dedicated attachment.
I would like to see a chapter on performance as my POC is not really good
on this point and I would like to know if the cause is clearly from NIO or
from my MINA adapter on
Le 3/1/13 5:00 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
I don't quite follow his arguments because this is easily fixed by either
using an anonymous class or a dedicated attachment.
I'm more concern about the need to allocate a buffer for every read (a
clear no go from my POV) an about the write handling.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo