Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-21 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2011, at 3:59 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny >wrote: > > > >> On 8/19/11 2:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >> > >>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >>>

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-20 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Aug 20, 2011, at 3:59 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> On 8/19/11 2:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> >>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >>> >>> On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > I'm wonderin

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-20 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 8/20/11 12:50 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnywrote: On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea? It seems to make things pretty complicated and adds another dimension to groking the behavior of y

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-20 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 8/20/11 12:59 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Emmanuel Lecharnywrote: On 8/19/11 2:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-20 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 8/19/11 2:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >> On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >> On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>> I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea? It seems to make th

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-20 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >> I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea? It seems to make >> things pretty complicated and adds another dimension to groking the behavior >> of your service. I'm not sure that i

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-19 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 8/19/11 2:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea? It seems to make things pretty complicated and adds another dimension to groking the behavior of you

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-19 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Steve Ulrich wrote: >> Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com] wrote: >> >> So, what is the scenario that we're trying to support?  I imagine >> appending headers to binary data would be one.  In this case is an >> Array of ByteBuffers really needed?  Why not

RE: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-19 Thread Steve Ulrich
> Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com] wrote: > > So, what is the scenario that we're trying to support? I imagine > appending headers to binary data would be one. In this case is an > Array of ByteBuffers really needed? Why not just send down one > ByteBuffer for the header and another

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-19 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>> I'm wondering.  Do you guys think it's a good idea?  It seems to make >>> things pretty complicated and adds another dimension to g

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-19 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea? It seems to make things >> pretty complicated and adds another dimension to groking the behavior of >> your service. I'm not sure that it's

Re: IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-19 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea? It seems to make things pretty complicated and adds another dimension to groking the behavior of your service. I'm not sure that it's necessary. Definitively a bad idea. What we need is an abstrac

IoBuffers of bytebuffers

2011-08-19 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea? It seems to make things pretty complicated and adds another dimension to groking the behavior of your service. I'm not sure that it's necessary. Thoughts? Regards, Alan