> Thanks.
>
> The protocol buffer codec might work. I will look at it and try to
> see how it might work.
>
> The biggest problem is that the spec is still in draft form and
> changing daily. I am trying to keep up with them.
>
> ..Mark
Would you mind my touching code inside your folder in sandb
Thanks.
The protocol buffer codec might work. I will look at it and try to
see how it might work.
The biggest problem is that the spec is still in draft form and
changing daily. I am trying to keep up with them.
..Mark
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Ashish wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 a
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Mark wrote:
> I am working on a prototype implementation in my sandbox. Hope to
> have a working version in a week or so.
Mark,
I was just browsing the spec and your implementation in sandbox.
Was wondering, if using protocol buffer codec would be a good idea fo
I am working on a prototype implementation in my sandbox. Hope to
have a working version in a week or so.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> Le Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:53:19 -0500,
> Mark a écrit :
>
>> forgot to add a link...
>>
>> http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-white
Le Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:53:19 -0500,
Mark a écrit :
> forgot to add a link...
>
> http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark wrote:
> > Has anyone looked into implementing the SPDY protocol on MINA?
> >
2 way requests, efficient pipelining, sounds yu
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Mark wrote:
> forgot to add a link...
>
> http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark wrote:
>> Has anyone looked into implementing the SPDY protocol on MINA?
Interesting. Worth exploring further :-)
--
thanks
ashish
forgot to add a link...
http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark wrote:
> Has anyone looked into implementing the SPDY protocol on MINA?
>
Has anyone looked into implementing the SPDY protocol on MINA?
