Re: Secured/Unsecured events ?

Le 5/13/13 10:30 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit : Hi, As I'm reading the TLS specs, I noticed that the processing of the close alarm, if not critical, may leave the underlaying transport connection (socket) open, probably to deal with STARTTLS behavior. Yes. So one option would be to had two new

Re: Secured/Unsecured events ?

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote: Le 5/13/13 10:30 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit : Hi, As I'm reading the TLS specs, I noticed that the processing of the close alarm, if not critical, may leave the underlaying transport connection (socket) open,

Re: Secured/Unsecured events ?

Le 5/14/13 11:35 AM, Jeff MAURY a écrit : On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote: Le 5/13/13 10:30 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit : Hi, As I'm reading the TLS specs, I noticed that the processing of the close alarm, if not critical, may leave the underlaying

Secured/Unsecured events ?

Hi, As I'm reading the TLS specs, I noticed that the processing of the close alarm, if not critical, may leave the underlaying transport connection (socket) open, probably to deal with STARTTLS behavior. So one option would be to had two new events: Secured (end of handshake) and Unsecured (Non