Luis Neves wrote:
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Luis Filipe dos Santos Neves wrote:
Mark wrote:
Does not sound like it is working as planned. Do you have a test
program
that demonstrates this behavior?
Yes. You can test the code below using netcat:
nc -i 5 localhost 1234
I get an err
Luis Neves wrote:
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Luis Filipe dos Santos Neves wrote:
Mark wrote:
Does not sound like it is working as planned. Do you have a test
program
that demonstrates this behavior?
Yes. You can test the code below using netcat:
nc -i 5 localhost 1234
I get an err
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Luis Filipe dos Santos Neves wrote:
Mark wrote:
Does not sound like it is working as planned. Do you have a test
program
that demonstrates this behavior?
Yes. You can test the code below using netcat:
nc -i 5 localhost 1234
I get an error while executing
Luis Filipe dos Santos Neves wrote:
Mark wrote:
Does not sound like it is working as planned. Do you have a test program
that demonstrates this behavior?
Yes. You can test the code below using netcat:
nc -i 5 localhost 1234
I get an error while executing your code :
Exception in
I am using netcat in cygwin. I will continue to look into this. Maybe some
others on the list have ideas...
On Jan 12, 2008 4:07 AM, Luis Neves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mark wrote:
> > This is my output:
> >
> > Listening on port 1234
> > Session Opened
> > Time for write:31 ms
>
Hello,
Mark wrote:
This is my output:
Listening on port 1234
Session Opened
Time for write:31 ms
Time for write:32 ms
This is much different from my results.
Are you using netcat to test? Does the windows version of netcat honours the
"-i" flag?
Here's the output I get after writing 1
This is my output:
Listening on port 1234
Session Opened
Time for write:31 ms
Time for write:32 ms
My setup is:
Windows XP
Dual Core 1.66GHz
2GB RAM
I can certainly understand where you are coming from here. I am wondering
if over the course of 50,000 messages getting written to the client that
Mark wrote:
> Does not sound like it is working as planned. Do you have a test program
> that demonstrates this behavior?
Yes. You can test the code below using netcat:
nc -i 5 localhost 1234
*
public class WriteRequestSnafuServer
{
private s
Does not sound like it is working as planned. Do you have a test program
that demonstrates this behavior?
On Jan 10, 2008 7:40 PM, Luis Neves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm running some tests with slow clients connected to a server that uses
> the
> recent WriteThrottleFilt
Hello all,
I'm running some tests with slow clients connected to a server that uses the
recent WriteThrottleFilter with a BLOCK policy and I'm having some unexpected
behaviour.
What I want is for the server to block the sending of messages when the write
queue is full, but, I do not want to
10 matches
Mail list logo
