Re: article about More New I/O APIs for Java

2007-05-23 Thread James Im
I sent the following email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] James Im wrote: In the MINA mailing list came up a question that I believe the API must answer. We need a way to query the system about the available native API. We need to know if we will get better performance with the asynchronous API or non-bl

Re: article about More New I/O APIs for Java

2007-05-22 Thread peter royal
On May 21, 2007, at 11:09 PM, James Im wrote: In the end, when talking about the asynchronous API versus the non-blocking API, I didn't get which one will give the best performance. Is he saying that it depends on the os? He didn't seem to give any sort of relative comparison between non-

Re : article about More New I/O APIs for Java

2007-05-22 Thread Dupont jean
ssage d'origine De : James Im <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : dev@mina.apache.org Envoyé le : Mardi, 22 Mai 2007, 8h09mn 55s Objet : Re: article about More New I/O APIs for Java In the end, when talking about the asynchronous API versus the non-blocking API, I didn't get which one will

Re: article about More New I/O APIs for Java

2007-05-21 Thread James Im
In the end, when talking about the asynchronous API versus the non-blocking API, I didn't get which one will give the best performance. Is he saying that it depends on the os? peter royal wrote: http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/more_new_io.html -pete ___

Re: article about More New I/O APIs for Java

2007-05-21 Thread Mark Webb
very cool stuff. On 5/21/07, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/more_new_io.html -pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi -- ..Cheers Mark

article about More New I/O APIs for Java

2007-05-21 Thread peter royal
http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/more_new_io.html -pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature