Re: two processes listening on same port

2007-09-05 Thread Mark
I updated the quick start guide. Updates should be visible in the next hour or so. On 9/5/07, hezjing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you think we should remove setReuseAddress(true) from the Quick Start > Guide? > see http://mina.apache.org/quick-start-guide.html > > On 9/3/07, Trustin Lee <[E

Re: two processes listening on same port

2007-09-05 Thread hezjing
Do you think we should remove setReuseAddress(true) from the Quick Start Guide? see http://mina.apache.org/quick-start-guide.html On 9/3/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/28/07, Adam Fisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Linux should do the same thing, and it's actually a very import

Re: two processes listening on same port

2007-09-02 Thread Trustin Lee
On 8/28/07, Adam Fisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Linux should do the same thing, and it's actually a very important feature. > A lot of protocols rely on this behavior, such as both TCP and UDP NAT > traversal. > > That said, I'm unclear why so many of the examples use setReuseAddress, > although

Re: two processes listening on same port

2007-08-27 Thread Adam Fisk
Linux should do the same thing, and it's actually a very important feature. A lot of protocols rely on this behavior, such as both TCP and UDP NAT traversal. That said, I'm unclear why so many of the examples use setReuseAddress, although I think I remember Trustin saying it improved performance i

Re: two processes listening on same port

2007-08-21 Thread Mark
Done. I updated examples-trunk for: httpserver.codec.Server proxy.Main reverser.Main sumup.Server The call to setReuseAddress(true) was taken out. On 8/21/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/20/07, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I am witnessin

Re: two processes listening on same port

2007-08-21 Thread Trustin Lee
On 8/20/07, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am witnessing some very weird behavior: two processes listening on the > same TCP port on the same machine. > using Windows XP Professional > > I thought this might be possible because my portable is multi-homed (wired + >

Re: two processes listening on same port

2007-08-21 Thread 向秦贤
IMHO, there is BIG problem, Layer. even this way can be done, It not tcp stack concept. maybe it's problem about a chain of responsibility. If I work this, I would build a listening process, and dispatch some work to different worker do details. Regards, 2007/8/20, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTEC

two processes listening on same port

2007-08-19 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Hello all, I am witnessing some very weird behavior: two processes listening on the same TCP port on the same machine. using Windows XP Professional I thought this might be possible because my portable is multi-homed (wired + wireless network) ? But I disabled the wireless network and it still w