+1 for this release
Thanks
yanping
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Gary wrote:
> +1 , Thanks.
>
> B. R,
> +Gary
>
> On 5/13/2016 9:53 AM, Gary wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a discussion releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > 0.1.2-incubating, release candidate 2.
+1 , Thanks.
B. R,
+Gary
On 5/13/2016 9:53 AM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a discussion releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.1.2-incubating, release candidate 2. This
> is the first release of Mnemonic.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
+1 sig/xsum are valid, RAT runs clean. I ran through the release checklist
and everything seems fine to me.
Patrick
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a discussion releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.1.2-incubating, release candidate 2.
Thanks Uma.
B.R,
+Gary.
On 5/12/2016 12:22 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Ah cool, thanks for the quick turnaround, Uma
>
> - Henry
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Gangumalla, Uma
> wrote:
>
>> I have just created a folder ³mnemonic² under
>>
Thanks Uma.
B.R,
+Gary.
On 5/12/2016 12:22 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Ah cool, thanks for the quick turnaround, Uma
>
> - Henry
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Gangumalla, Uma
> wrote:
>
>> I have just created a folder ³mnemonic² under
>>
Hi Mahdi,
Welcome and I think most of your understanding are correct, but there
are two points I'd like to make it more clear for your understanding
about the current status of this project from my point of view.
1) Mnemonic has been designed to remove cache layer instead of
enhancing it.
Hi all,
This is a call for a discussion releasing Apache Mnemonic
0.1.2-incubating, release candidate 2. This
is the first release of Mnemonic.
The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: