RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Yanhui ZHAO
Built and tested, +1 for release. Thanks Yanhui From: Chunyong He Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 9:49 AM To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1] +1 Thanks, C

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Gary Wong
Hi Patrick, Debo, It is my bad, I suggest to use the "[CANCEL]", as afterthought, for this case, we should use "[UPDATE]", that indicates only the content of vote has been changed nothing else. Thanks Very truly yours Gary On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > I'm confused, I

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Debojyoti Dutta
Sorry for the confusion. Gary suggested that we cancel the vote thread and re start it due to the formatting errors in the email. The code etc hasn't changed. Hence the same release number. Do we still have to re number? Debo Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 9, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Patrick Hunt

Re: Apache Mnemonic Releasing

2017-06-09 Thread Patrick Hunt
Very thorough. You might want to include some notes about what to do if the RC is voted against, or if a new rc is needed for any reason (i.e. the process for cancelling the current vote thread and starting a new one) Patrick On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote: > Overall it w

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Patrick Hunt
I'm confused, I thought this rc (rc1) voting was cancelled: "[CANCEL] Cancelling the vote due to Formatting woes ..." in such cases a new vote should be started, with a new rc number, in order to remove any ambiguity/confusion. Patrick On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Chunyong He wrote: > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Chunyong He
+1 Thanks, Chunyong On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Gary Wong wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > License is okay, all tests pass, keys are correct > > Thanks > Gary > > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic > > 0

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Johnu George (johnugeo)
+1 Source built and ran tests. On 6/9/17, 9:34 AM, "Debojyoti Dutta" wrote: Hi all, This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic 0.8.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This is the new release of Mnemonic incubating. The source tarball, including signatures, diges

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Gary Wong
+1 (non-binding) License is okay, all tests pass, keys are correct Thanks Gary On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic > 0.8.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating. > > The

[VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Debojyoti Dutta
Hi all, This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic 0.8.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This is the new release of Mnemonic incubating. The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.8.0-incubating-rc1/src

[CANCEL] Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Debojyoti Dutta
[CANCEL] Cancelling the vote due to Formatting woes ... On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic > 0.8.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating. > > The source tarball, including

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-06-09 Thread Johnu George (johnugeo)
+1 Source built and ran tests. On 6/8/17, 10:55 PM, "Debojyoti Dutta" wrote: Folks please cut paste the links and check it out. I will update the wiki to reflect this. I had cut pasted the boilerplate from the wiki and forgot to fix the links after editing the links to re