[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106801
]
Carlos Sanchez edited comment on MOJO-908 at 9/7/07 8:09 PM:
-
Example in http://q4e.googlecode.com/
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106801
]
Carlos Sanchez commented on MOJO-908:
-
Example in
https://q4e.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/features/org.apache.maven.feature
eclipse-feature lifecycle installs jars with the wrong extension
Key: MOJO-908
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-908
Project: Mojo
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
I'm +1 for moving it (obviously, I guess).
-john
On Sep 7, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
The Maven PMC recently voted on the maven dev list to assume
responsibility for the shade plugin code. It’s up to this group if
that transfer results in a fork or a source move.
Vote is open
[x ] Move the code to Apache and remove it from the mojo svn
On 9/7/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> The Maven PMC recently voted on the maven dev list to assume responsibility
> for the shade plugin code. It's up to this group if that transfer results in
> a fork or a source
The Maven PMC recently voted on the maven dev list to assume
responsibility for the shade plugin code. It's up to this group if that
transfer results in a fork or a source move.
Vote is open for 72hrs.
Please vote:
[ ] Move the code to Apache and remove it from the mojo svn
[ ] Leave the
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106790
]
Arnaud Heritier commented on MOJO-449:
--
I tested the last patch and it's working fine (except that you have to add a
depe
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Vicente closed MOJO-907.
--
Resolution: Fixed
released this day, September 7th 2007 as 1.0-SNAPSHOT :
dashboard-maven-plugin-1.0-20070907.
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Vicente closed MOJO-891.
--
Resolution: Fixed
released this day, September 7th 2007 as 1.0-SNAPSHOT :
dashboard-maven-plugin-1.0-20070907.
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106764
]
Carlos Sanchez commented on MOJO-762:
-
i haven't got any answer from Alexandre ROMAN yet, is he willing to maintain
this?
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106762
]
Romain PELISSE commented on MOJO-762:
-
Hi,
I tested the path on a couple of project so far ( pmd-jerry, pmd itself, and
s
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Vicente reassigned MOJO-907:
--
Assignee: David Vicente
> Dashboard Plugin Clover Historic Report Generation
>
Dashboard Plugin Clover Historic Report Generation
--
Key: MOJO-907
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-907
Project: Mojo
Issue Type: Bug
Components: dashboard
Environm
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106747
]
Asgeir S. Nilsen commented on MOJO-806:
---
Yeah, the problem in MOJO-840 in essence also is due to the reuse of the daemon
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106745
]
Asgeir S. Nilsen commented on MOJO-840:
---
I've tested a SNAPSHOT build from svn, and can confirm that it works for me.
>
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106746
]
Asgeir S. Nilsen commented on MOJO-898:
---
I've tested a SNAPSHOT build from svn trunk, and can confirm that it works for
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Williams updated MOJO-904:
-
Attachment: l10n-exclusions.diff
I left the includes aggregation also, who knows why someone might want t
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106727
]
Andrew Williams commented on MOJO-904:
--
You're quite right, the patch is wrong - I shall rewrite it to properly combine
t
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106726
]
Milos Kleint commented on MOJO-904:
---
I guess we probably need to support only additional excludes. There's no point
in inclu
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106725
]
Milos Kleint edited comment on MOJO-904 at 9/7/07 5:29 AM:
---
If resource defines excludes, it's used a
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106725
]
Milos Kleint commented on MOJO-904:
---
If resource defines excludes, it's used and the plugin configuration is not
used.
So f
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106722
]
Andrew Williams commented on MOJO-904:
--
As far as I could tell my patch does still consider the resources configuration
t
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_106721
]
Milos Kleint commented on MOJO-904:
---
I'm not completely sure the includes/excludes are necessary. Using the defaults
also wo
[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNBMODULE-18?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Milos Kleint closed MNBMODULE-18.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.7
applied. Thanks.
> Wrong parameter used for userdir in R
24 matches
Mail list logo
