[mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-103) provide a way to skip mojo execution

2013-07-17 Thread Jesse Farinacci (JIRA)
jieryn

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release License Maven Plugin 1.5

2013-05-16 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Tony Chemit wrote: > I'd like to release License Maven Plugin 1.5 (first mojo release of the year > ! :)) +1 .. tested basic usage, no obvious regressions, works for me -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binar

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release mojo-parent version 31 and mojo-sandbox-parent version 12 (take 2)

2013-01-31 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Fred Cooke wrote: > To 32? Or 3 variants of 31 in the wild? :-) > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Anders Hammar wrote: >> >> I think we should file a ticket for that and do the change. Unfortunately >> it means re-rolling again. They aren't "in the

Re: [mojo-dev] Patch page for contributions through GIT

2012-06-14 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > > I see more and more patches being provided from a GIT-fork of our projects. > To me it's still a mystery how to translate them to usable svn-patches. > I think it's an illusion that we can force the contributors to provide only

Re: [mojo-dev] Invite Russell Gold as mojo commiter

2012-05-30 Thread Jesse Farinacci
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > I'd like to invite Russell Gold as a new mojo committer. +1 Yeah baby -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those that can not. -

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release chronos-jmeter 1.0 and chronos-report 1.0

2012-04-19 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Kent Sølvsten wrote: > After having used the beta versions for quite a while, I would now like to > release version 1.0 of chronos +0 until a proper JIRA component is available, instead of just MOJO- prefix. -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [VOTE] Invite Shinsuke Sugaya to become a Mojo committer

2012-02-07 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Shinsuke Sugaya wrote: > Thank you all for the votes! > I'll do my best to work on the plugin. > Regards, >  shinsuke Welcome aboard!! Shinsuke contacted me privately with xircle account named 'shinsuke'. Would someone with karma please attend? Thank yo

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [VOTE] Invite Shinsuke Sugaya to become a Mojo committer

2012-02-07 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > We need to know his user id... > then one of us despots can add him. > no need for a haus task My bad, sorry! I have sent an email to Shinsuke Sugaya to create a xircle account. -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in thi

[mojo-dev] Re: [VOTE] Invite Shinsuke Sugaya to become a Mojo committer

2012-02-07 Thread Jesse Farinacci
And here is my +1 ... The vote has passed with 5 affirmative votes: Jesse Farinacci, Olivier Lamy, Dan Tran, Tony Chemit, and Stephen Connolly. I opened http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2210 to track the membership addition. Thank you, -Jesse On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Jesse

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Invite Shinsuke Sugaya to become a Mojo committer

2012-01-29 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, I'd like to invite Shinsuke Sugaya to become a Mojo committer for the JSPC project. Shinsuke has provided several patches to the JSPC project, and is involved with a lot of the tickets. Shinsuke agreed to take over maintainership for this plugin. This is result of the Mojo Maintainer C

Re: [mojo-dev] Preview mojo sites with fluido

2012-01-03 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > http://people.apache.org/~rfscholte/sql-maven-plugin_fluido/ > http://people.apache.org/~rfscholte/siteskinner-maven-plugin_fluido/ (profile: > pre-release) > http://people.apache.org/~rfscholte/warcustoms-maven-plugin_fluido/ (pr

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Retire openjpa-maven-plugin

2011-12-21 Thread Jesse Farinacci
+1 On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Paul Gier wrote: > Given that this plugin is now officially part of the openjpa project > [1][2], I think it makes sense to retire it here. > The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. > Here's my +1 > > [1]http://markmail.org/message/

Re: [mojo-dev] Propose Thomas Broyer as Mojo dev for gwt-maven-plugin

2011-12-08 Thread Jesse Farinacci
+1 On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > Thomas Broyer has helped on gwt maven plugin > So I propose him as Mojo committer > > Here my +1. -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those that can not.

Re: [mojo-dev] What's happening with the versions-maven-plugin

2011-11-09 Thread Jesse Farinacci
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/sandbox/mrm Bravo. -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those that can not. - To u

[mojo-dev] git / github integration

2011-11-07 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, What is the status of the Git / GitHub integration thing that has been discussed a few times? After using git all day, working with subversion just sucks all the motivation out of a project. -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those th

Re: [mojo-dev] Vote: Promote chronos form sandbox to proper

2011-10-25 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Kent Sølvsten wrote: > I honestly think the naming is quite good. > Does this answer Your concern? Thank you, yes. Ship it! -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those that can not. --

Re: [mojo-dev] Vote: Promote chronos form sandbox to proper

2011-10-25 Thread Jesse Farinacci
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Kent Sølvsten wrote: > The Chronos plugin was donated to the sandbox 3 years ago. After having been > dormant for a period, development is now resumed and the plugin have been > fairly active for the last 6 months. -0 I would renew my hesitation with the 'chro

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Invite Jesse Farinacci as mojo committer

2011-10-05 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > please can a despot grant the adequate privileges? I created https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2140 and included my public SSH key. -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and thos

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Invite Jesse Farinacci as mojo committer

2011-10-02 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > So, please welcome Jesse as a new Mojo committer :D > please can a despot grant the adequate privileges? I extend a happy thanks to the Mojo team for allowing me to take an increased role in shaping the project! Again, thank you

Re: [mojo-dev] Tomcat Maven Plugin has a new home at Apache Software Foundation.

2011-09-08 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Moving the mojo to ASF is now finished. > The new home is now here : http://tomcat.apache.org/maven-plugin.html . Olivier, this is wistful but good news. We all owe Olivier a beer for the efforts he put in to make this a successful

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] move back github stuff to codehaus

2011-08-29 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Sure the committers of Sonatype will do their best to maintain it, but I > agree with Mark: Codehaus would be a better place, either svn or git ;) I think it's probably a good idea to keep things in one place. Please, git is ju

Re: [mojo-dev] Vote: Promote chronos from sandbox to proper

2011-06-27 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Kent Sølvsten wrote: > I believe now is the time to promote the plugin from the sandbox. Since the > code should be in a pretty stable state, I expect to head immediately for a > beta release, and then hopefully a final 1.0 release within a month or 2

Re: [mojo-dev] mail-maven-plugin

2011-05-19 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Hi Markus, On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Markus Mahlberg wrote: > I also added some of the requirements of the developer guidelines, though > documentation is missing atm. Check out wagon-gitsite[1] for an easy and convenient way to publish your Maven plugin's site to github's static pages (

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release FindBugs Maven Plugin version 2.3.2

2011-03-17 Thread Jesse Farinacci
+1 non-binding. Staged release works in all our projects. Thank you!! On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Garvin LeClaire wrote: > Staging Repositories: > General: https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/ > Exclusive: > https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-012

[mojo-dev] FindBugs v2.3.2

2011-03-10 Thread Jesse Farinacci
I'm requesting a release of findbugs-m-p:2.3.2. There were 15 issues solved already[1], including several fixes for proper maven 3 exploitation. I've been using 2.3.2-SNAPSHOT for quite a while now, but we recently lost a disk which contained all of our proxied MRM repos as well as our SNAPSHOTS...

[mojo-dev] Re: [UPDATE] [VOTE] Release gwt-maven-plugin 2.2.0

2011-02-22 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:47 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > I've run the expected release process, the staged plugin is available at > https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-001/ > To avoid missunderstandings, I've removed the one at people.apache.org I've test

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release gwt-maven-plugin 2.2.0

2011-02-22 Thread Jesse Farinacci
First off, W00T! :-) On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:04 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > You can check the site and test the artifact > from http://people.apache.org/~nicolas/staging/org/codehaus/mojo/gwt-maven-plugin/2.2.0/ Is there any reason we aren't following http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/per

Re: [mojo-dev] new plugin proposal : maven cxx plugin

2011-01-12 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:59 AM, wrote: > I choose to release this plugin under org.codehaus.mojo group id with > artifactId > maven-cxx-plugin Typically, Mojo Codehaus plugins do not use the maven-xxx-plugin format, but rather, xxx-maven-plugin. -Jesse -- There are 10 types of p

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] release openjpa-maven-plugin 1.2

2010-12-02 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Hi Mark, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > There are a few things which cannot be fixed without binding the plugin to a > specific OpenJPA version. This is only possible if we move the plugin over > from codehaus to the OpenJPA tools project. > > I will call a [DISCUSS]

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] release openjpa-maven-plugin 1.2

2010-12-02 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > I'd like to release the > openjpa-maven-plugin-1.2 Is this part of some level set prior to handing the plugin over to Apache OpenJPA? I've come to depend on the openjpa-m-p and at least one thing that is vital for my organizat

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Gwt Maven Plugin 2.1.0

2010-11-02 Thread Jesse Farinacci
+1 I have tested 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT $HEAD against about a half dozen projects and things are working nicely. -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those that can not. - To unsubscribe

Re: [mojo-dev] releasing gwt plugin 2.1 for gwt 2.1.0

2010-11-01 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Hi Oliver, On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > You know : having an it test will prevent this to fail again in the future :-) In the interest in losing a few hours today instead of losing what would probably be days or weeks later when it wasn't fresh in my mind... I attached

Re: [mojo-dev] releasing gwt plugin 2.1 for gwt 2.1.0

2010-11-01 Thread Jesse Farinacci
hen we're definitely not passing that classpath to the embedded server. -Jesse On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > Any way to provide a sample project to reproduce the issue ? > > 2010/11/1 Jesse Farinacci : >> Hi Oliver, >> >> On Mo

Re: [mojo-dev] releasing gwt plugin 2.1 for gwt 2.1.0

2010-11-01 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Hi Oliver, On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Any objections to cut a release 2.1 for the recently released gwt 2.1.0 ? Yes. There's a huge regression documented in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGWT-226 .. if I could mark it as a blocker, I would. -Jesse -- There are 10

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [12040] trunk/mojo/mojo-parent/pom.xml: upgrade some plugins versions.

2010-03-30 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Hi Robert, On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > > Jira has still one issue for the parent-pom, which I think could be solved > by now. > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1043 > > I guess Bentmann could answer this. Well, m-enforcer-p:1.0 hasn't yet been released. -Jesse

Re: [mojo-dev] Plugin proposal - Unit test conformity checker

2010-03-09 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Hi Bowden, On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Bowden Salis wrote: > > The plugin features the ability to... > * Define an inclusion set of classes (ie. all application and test classes) > * Define an exclusion set of classes that you do not consider needing tests > * Define test classes that are pla