Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Put our SVN in readonly and ask for dump for migration

2015-05-04 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 Op Sun, 03 May 2015 21:48:41 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus bmat...@batmat.net: Hi all, As a followup to previous threads, I guess it's time for us to try and move on. Indeed, the announcement says services should be shut down the 17 May. So, to go forward, I'd like to ask Codehaus

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Deprecate/disable all ML of MOJO@Codehaus

2015-05-04 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I don't think we have a real choice here. Once the Codehaus domain is gone including its infra then there are no mailinglists anymore. The vote should be about the move to X and how to register it for Markmail and Nabble. Robert Op Mon, 04 May 2015 15:36:52 +0200 schreef Baptiste

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Deprecate/disable all ML of MOJO@Codehaus

2015-05-04 Thread Robert Scholte
option. Would you prefer to have a vote for that and reconsider where we go for the MLs? 2015-05-04 19:41 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: Hi, I don't think we have a real choice here. Once the Codehaus domain is gone including its infra then there are no mailinglists

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Deprecate/disable all ML of MOJO@Codehaus

2015-05-04 Thread Robert Scholte
Looking good, very good. Robert Op Mon, 04 May 2015 22:16:32 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus bmat...@batmat.net: I just drafted that for informing about the ML terminations: https://github.com/mojohaus/mojohaus.github.io/wiki/Termination-mail WDYT? 2015-05-04 21:49 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Deprecate/disable all ML of MOJO@Codehaus

2015-05-04 Thread Robert Scholte
. - Announcements List : same as user list. I don't see us keeping it; WDYT? Do you agree? 2015-05-04 20:38 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: If the google group is fully up and running, then I don't see any reason for voting. You could do a (pre-)announcement saying this ML

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

2015-04-09 Thread Robert Scholte
Paul Hammant(cc) did a Jira export for QDox[1] IMHO that's complete enough. If we agree on such approach, Paul can probably help us or give the instructions how he did it. thanks, Robert [1] http://paul-hammant.github.io/Old_Qdox_Issues/ Op Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:14:52 +0200 schreef Baptiste

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2045) Usage pages show always version 1.0.0 of the plugin instead of the current version

2015-04-08 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Fixed

Re: [mojo-dev] flatten-maven-plugin BOM support and flexibility

2015-04-08 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, Don't expect http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2412 to be fixed, we're moving to https://github.com/mojohaus See the mailinglist for Codehaus EOL. Robert Op Wed, 08 Apr 2015 23:32:35 +0200 schreef Jörg Hohwiller jo...@j-hohwiller.de: Hi there, I refactored the

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-11 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 for MojoHaus Op Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:06:34 +0100 schreef Brett Okken brett.okken...@gmail.com: +1 for MojoHaus On Mar 11, 2015 4:35 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 March 2015 at 07:54, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: then we have a few

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Move the shitty-maven-plugin to the Graveyard

2015-03-03 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 Op Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:51:58 +0100 schreef Baptiste Mathus bapti...@codehaus.org: Well, since this didn't seem to trigger counter opinions I'm starting a formal vote. That vote is to deprecate the shitty-maven-plugin, and move it to the mojo's graveyard. [ ] +1 : deprecate it [ ] 0 :

Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration

2015-03-02 Thread Robert Scholte
IMHO the Apache Maven team should focus on Maven Core, (java)-build lifecycle plugins, plugin-development tools, transport (SCM, Wagon) and project-health tools. There are probably a couple of Codehaus-Mojo plugins which might be interesting to move Apache Maven (assuming legal issues will

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Animal Sniffer 1.14

2015-02-26 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 Op Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:14:00 +0100 schreef Stephane Nicoll stephane.nic...@gmail.com: Hi, This release brings full Java8 compatibility thanks to MANIMALSNIFFER-51 We solved 4 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12070version=20742 There are still 20

Re: [mojo-dev] flatten-maven-plugin design decision (BOM and other stuff)

2015-02-14 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Jörg, I think your adjustment of rev. 20330 to the optional-elements-modeMinimum/verify.groovy is incorrect. This project results in a jar so there's no reason to keep dependencyManagement here: all dependencies should be resolved. What I'm missing is a project *using* this bom. I seem

Re: [mojo-dev] flatten-maven-plugin design decision (BOM and other stuff)

2015-02-14 Thread Robert Scholte
Maven, we might want to call it dependable-pom. WDYT? Robert Op Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:17:45 +0100 schreef Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: Hi Jörg, I think your adjustment of rev. 20330 to the optional-elements-modeMinimum/verify.groovy is incorrect. This project results

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Minimum requirements for Mojo Plugins

2015-02-10 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:26:57 +0100 schreef Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net: I would recommend that we migrate to the following requirement for all our plugins: 1. Minimum Maven version 3.0.4 (i.e. drop support for Maven 2.x) As discussed (and concluded) somewhere else, we should go

[mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [20398] trunk/mojo/jaxb2-maven-plugin: Assigned Maven 3.0. 4 as minimum Maven version for the jaxb2-maven-plugin.

2015-02-07 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Lennart, Why 3.0.4? This version has a security issue[1] fixed in 3.0.5 (it is actually the only fix in 3.0.5). And it is probably easier to say the plugin is Maven3 compatible, which implies at least Maven 3.0. Is there a specific interface change in 3.0.4 you depend on? thanks, Robert

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [20398] trunk/mojo/jaxb2-maven-plugin: Assigned Maven 3.0. 4 as minimum Maven version for the jaxb2-maven-plugin.

2015-02-07 Thread Robert Scholte
soonish. :) 2015-02-07 10:55 GMT+01:00 Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: From a user/community perspective I would go for 3.0 as a minimum. Testing with a wide range of versions would be good. So the minimum (3.0) and the latest (3.2.5 if available on Bamboo) would already cover

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [20398] trunk/mojo/jaxb2-maven-plugin: Assigned Maven 3.0. 4 as minimum Maven version for the jaxb2-maven-plugin.

2015-02-07 Thread Robert Scholte
...@gmail.com: Hello there, I took the version defined/used by the Codehaus Bamboo servers for ITs. I can easily pick another version for more sensible reasons. Which 3.0.x version is the better one to use? (I suppose I should adjust the bamboo jobs as well, right?) 2015-02-07 10:29 GMT+01:00 Robert

Re: [mojo-dev] flatten-maven-plugin design decision (BOM and other stuff)

2015-01-18 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:01:16 +0100 schreef Jörg Hohwiller jo...@j-hohwiller.de: Hi there, I would like to open a discussion about the design of flatten-maven-plugin. Important issue is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-2041 Therefore I already applied the old code back onto trunk and

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MJAXB-51) Stale detection does not see that one more schema file has been added to build

2015-01-18 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MANIMALSNIFFER-58) Need Java 1.8 signature

2015-01-16 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Duplicate

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MANIMALSNIFFER-49) Support covariant return types

2014-12-18 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MANIMALSNIFFER-50) Apply plugin Annotations (instead of current doclet tags)

2014-12-17 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MANIMALSNIFFER-51) Upgrade ASM to 5.0.3

2014-12-16 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte created an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MANIMALSNIFFER-51) Upgrade ASM to 5.0.3

2014-12-16 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MANIMALSNIFFER-50) Apply plugin Annotations (instead of current doclet tags)

2014-12-13 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte created an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MANIMALSNIFFER-50) Apply plugin Annotations (instead of current doclet tags)

2014-12-13 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte assigned an issue to Robert Scholte

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MANIMALSNIFFER-49) Support covariant return types

2014-12-10 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte created an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [20066] trunk/mojo/flatten-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/ flatten: MOJO-2041: implemented, IT still missing

2014-10-22 Thread Robert Scholte
to finally pull out beta3. Before that I would like to know if there are any concerns (esp. according to MOJO-2042). Regards Jörg Am 21.10.2014 19:40, schrieb Robert Scholte: I think reverting is the best option right now. Robert Op Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:53:33 +0200 schreef Jörg Hohwiller jo...@j

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [20066] trunk/mojo/flatten-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/ flatten: MOJO-2041: implemented, IT still missing

2014-10-21 Thread Robert Scholte
and the current beta2 has bugs that prevents core usage of flatten-maven-plugin in some cases what is rather bad. Unfortunately SVN is not very strong on feature branches and merging. I am spoiled by git and other more agile infrastructure now... Regards Jörg Am 19.10.2014 22:34, schrieb Robert Scholte

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [20066] trunk/mojo/flatten-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/ flatten: MOJO-2041: implemented, IT still missing

2014-10-19 Thread Robert Scholte
:18, schrieb Robert Scholte: Hi Jörg, I don't think this is correct. The whole idea is that: - pom projects should stay as they are - non-pom files should be flattened, meaning mainly resolving dependencies. so parent, modules, properties and reporting are already included for the first, and should

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-146) Cannot execute a binary in the submodule of a multi-module project without tricks

2014-10-15 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [20066] trunk/mojo/flatten-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/ flatten: MOJO-2041: implemented, IT still missing

2014-10-15 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Jörg, I don't think this is correct. The whole idea is that: - pom projects should stay as they are - non-pom files should be flattened, meaning mainly resolving dependencies. so parent, modules, properties and reporting are already included for the first, and should *never* be added to

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-145) There is a 12 second delay after invoking exec:java or exec:exec with JDK8

2014-10-09 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-145) There is a 12 second delay after invoking exec:java or exec:exec

2014-10-03 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Not A Bug

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-145) There is a 12 second delay after invoking exec:java or exec:exec

2014-10-02 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Not A Bug

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release flatten-maven-plugin version 1.0.0-beta-3

2014-10-01 Thread Robert Scholte
() ) { return true; } } } return false; } Any ideas what makes the difference? Different maven version using different super POM with central URL pointing to repo1.maven.org? Thanks Jörg Am 28.09.2014 21:58, schrieb Robert Scholte: Hi, FYI

Re: [mojo-dev] [ANN] extra-enforcer-rules 1.0-beta-3 Released

2014-09-29 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I still consider Maven as a language independent build management tool. In case of the enforceBytecodeVersion I think we should add an API so it can be implemented for other packaging types as well. Shouldn't be too hard to do so, just needs to be done. @Stephen, which other rules do you

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release extra-enforcer-rules version 1.0-beta-3

2014-09-24 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 Robert Op Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:48:49 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus bapti...@codehaus.org: Hi, I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-3 of the extra-enforcer-rules project. That project provides additional rules for the Apache Maven's Enforcer Plugin. We solved 3 issues:

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release - AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7

2014-09-09 Thread Robert Scholte
Current trunk runs fine on my system: Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 14:51:28+0100) Maven home: D:\apache-maven-3.0.5\bin\.. Java version: 1.7.0_55, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_55\jre Default locale: nl_NL,

Re: [mojo-dev] The Tools.jar (or equivalent dependency)

2014-09-09 Thread Robert Scholte
Just quoting the ajdoc-ref[1] ajdoc currently requires the tools.jar from J2SE 1.3 to be on the classpath. Normally the scripts set this up, assuming that your JAVA_HOME variable points to an appropriate installation of Java. You may need to provide this jar when using a different version

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-08 Thread Robert Scholte
under 3 above. 2014-09-04 21:07 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com : Op Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:44:10 +0200 schreef Lennart Jörelid lennart.jore...@gmail.com: I just noted, but adding a Max JDK version doesn't seem to make any sense in this case. The AspectJ compiler

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-08 Thread Robert Scholte
- to make the transition to JDK 9 painless. 2014-09-08 19:29 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: This is an interesting case, because the compile-time JDK is less then the runtime JDK (1.5 and 1.6 in same order). Normally it's the other way around. However, to be able to run

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte
effectively be the same as setting a *maximum* JDK version. 2014-09-02 23:30 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: Hi, I've added the enforceBytecodeVersion rule to see which jar(s) are causing problems. It seems that aspectjtools can't run with JDK5. As long

Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSSION] Switching plugins to MIT license

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, read http://www.codehaus.org/customs/licenses.html The advice is to use ASL2, although MIT is permitted. I want to hear the facts why they say MIT would be better. Robert Op Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:40:48 +0200 schreef Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com: OK, They are not my plugins, they belong to

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [DISCUSSION] Relax the procedure to push for 1.0

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, If you compare the differences between Apaches PMC and teammembers, then the difference between a Codehaus despot and teammember is much smaller. Teammembers already have a lot of rights for the infrastructure[1], there's no such thing as binding votes. Main difference between a despot

Re: [mojo-dev] verify.groovy going insane?

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte
Maybe the difference between String and GString[1] equals should always work Robert [1] http://groovy.codehaus.org/Strings+and+GString Op Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:59:54 +0200 schreef Jörg Hohwiller jo...@j-hohwiller.de: Hi there, I am not a groovy expert and need some help. An IT of

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I've fixed the unittest, next step is to fix the integration tests. I've added a JDK8 task to the integration tests, so now it will be tested with the minimum (JDK5) and maximum, both with Maven-2.2.1. There are only linux bambooo-agents available right now. According to JIRA[1] there

Re: Re[2]: [mojo-dev] status of aspectj-maven-plugin

2014-09-02 Thread Robert Scholte
, preferably with toolchains to manage the JDK versions. Not sure if it's worth it to implement, though. For me this is a valid reason to change the required JDK, I'll leave it up to you. Robert Op Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:00:26 +0200 schreef Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: Hi

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDHELPER-60) Version with build number not properly recognized as greater than version without build number.

2014-09-01 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDHELPER-60) Version with build number not properly recognized as greater than version without build number.

2014-09-01 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte edited a comment on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2039) Maven 3.2.2 build error with flatten plugin

2014-08-28 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2039) Maven 3.2.2 build error with flatten plugin

2014-08-28 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte edited a comment on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2041) Support optionally keeping dependencyManagement section in flatten poms that are used a BOM

2014-08-13 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2039) Maven 3.2 build error with flatten plugin

2014-08-01 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2039) Maven 3.2.2 build error with flatten plugin

2014-08-01 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2039) Maven 3.2.2 build error with flatten plugin

2014-08-01 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2039) Maven 3.2.2 build error with flatten plugin

2014-08-01 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2039) Maven 3.2.2 build error with flatten plugin

2014-08-01 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2038) Keep plugins with extensions

2014-08-01 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2038) Keep plugins with extensions

2014-07-31 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte created an issue

[mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [19892] site/src/site/apt/plugins.apt: findbugs-maven-plugin 3.0.0 release

2014-07-25 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:16:17 +0200 schreef glecla...@codehaus.org: Revision: 19892 Author: gleclaire Date: 2014-07-25 10:16:17 -0500 (Fri, 25 Jul 2014) Log Message findbugs-maven-plugin 3.0.0 release Modified Paths site/src/site/apt/plugins.apt Diff Modified:

[mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [19892] site/src/site/apt/plugins.apt: findbugs-maven-plugin 3.0.0 release

2014-07-25 Thread Robert Scholte
Shouldn't it be 2.5.5 instead of 3.0.0? Robert Op Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:16:17 +0200 schreef glecla...@codehaus.org: Revision: 19892 Author: gleclaire Date: 2014-07-25 10:16:17 -0500 (Fri, 25 Jul 2014) Log Message findbugs-maven-plugin 3.0.0 release Modified Paths

[mojo-dev] [ANN] Mock Repository Manager Maven Plugin 1.0-beta-2 Released

2014-07-08 Thread Robert Scholte
settings.xml for non-localhost users Enjoy, The Mojo team. Robert Scholte - To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Mock Repository Manager version 1.0-beta-2

2014-07-07 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 Op Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:06:52 +0200 schreef Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: Hi, I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the Mock Repository Manager The Mock Repository Manager suite of projects are used to provide mock or lightweight Maven Repository Managers for use

[mojo-dev] [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Mock Repository Manager version 1.0-beta-2

2014-07-07 Thread Robert Scholte
The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Karl Heinz Marbaise, Robert Scholte 0 : -1 : I'll proceed with the release process. thanks, Robert Op Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:06:52 +0200 schreef Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: Hi, I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2

[mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release Mock Repository Manager version 1.0-beta-2

2014-07-04 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the Mock Repository Manager The Mock Repository Manager suite of projects are used to provide mock or lightweight Maven Repository Managers for use during integration testing of Maven plugins. We solved 4 issues:

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release MOJODEV Maven Plugin - Release 1.0-beta-1 (take 2)

2014-07-02 Thread Robert Scholte
projects at work as well ( we adopt maven code style and svn). import-codehaus-certificate is very helpful, try to read the instructions from Codehaus and import manually is a pain IMO Thanks -Dan On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com wrote: Hi Dan, I

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release MOJODEV Maven Plugin - Release 1.0-beta-1 (take 2)

2014-06-30 Thread Robert Scholte
that to rename 'prepare-environment' back to 'import-codehaus-certificate' ( rather then removing it) and call it alpha, to let ppl know it it very specify MOJO at codehaus development. Thanks -Dan On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com wrote

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release MOJODEV Maven Plugin - Release 1.0-beta-1 (take 2)

2014-06-29 Thread Robert Scholte
should change it back to 'import-codehaus-certificates. Thoughts? Thanks -Dan On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com wrote: I agree with Baptiste here. I'm also wondering if this project should be pushed to Maven central, since it's first of all

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release MOJODEV Maven Plugin - Release 1.0-beta-1 (take 2)

2014-06-29 Thread Robert Scholte
other project can use it as well including my internal plugin development. BTW, I have a really need for this. What would it take todo so? should we push it as alpha while waiting for more concrete decision? -D On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release MOJODEV Maven Plugin - Release 1.0-beta-1 (take 2)

2014-06-28 Thread Robert Scholte
I agree with Baptiste here. I'm also wondering if this project should be pushed to Maven central, since it's first of all a codehaus mojo specific plugin. so -1 Robert Op Sat, 28 Jun 2014 00:19:47 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus bapti...@codehaus.org: I'm not personally worried,

Re: [mojo-dev] mojodev productivity plugin

2014-06-24 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Dan, just a thought: how about changing the goals to: * prepare-environment or prepare-system * prepare-eclipse * prepare-project this way it's possible to do additional tasks without creating new goals, since these tasks should all be done when preparing X. Based on

Re: [mojo-dev] First entry at http://mojo.codehaus.org/KEYS looks very longggg

2014-06-23 Thread Robert Scholte
It's not mine, it's Lennarts. This happens when you generate your keys multiple times. For instance, if you reinstall your machine are have a new one. These keys will then be merged. That happened to me about 3 times, so mines a bit longer than the average one. It shouldn't be an issue,

Re: [mojo-dev] SQL Maven Plugin

2014-06-23 Thread Robert Scholte
IIRC to be compatible with Maven 2.0.6 I think I did this together with Mark. I'm pretty sure you'll discover it ones you remove it. Robert Op Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:30:08 +0200 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de: Hi, just a question concerning the SQL Maven Plugin... can someone

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: MVERSIONS-258 Add mojo display-ancestors which will output the line of heritage for parent poms

2014-06-23 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 for the m-dependency-p Op Mon, 23 Jun 2014 01:08:09 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com: Ancestors are dependencies, you cannot build a project without its parent... You just don't reference them in a dependencies section is all! I think it actually would suit

[mojo-dev] EOL QDox-Attributes and QDox-XML?

2014-06-21 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi all, 40% of the current open issues are related to QDox-attributes and QDox-XML. QDOX-20[1]: Migrate qdox-attributes and qdox-xml to maven 2 QDOX-21[2]: Upload website for qdox-xml and qdox-attributes They're open for about 5 years, so to me it looks like there's not enough interest for it to

Re: [mojo-dev] EOL QDox-Attributes and QDox-XML?

2014-06-21 Thread Robert Scholte
ignore, wrong list... Op Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:28:05 +0200 schreef Robert Scholte codeh...@sourcegrounds.com: Hi all, 40% of the current open issues are related to QDox-attributes and QDox-XML. QDOX-20[1]: Migrate qdox-attributes and qdox-xml to maven 2 QDOX-21[2]: Upload website for qdox

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2027) flatten-maven-plugin: ability to preserve developer information

2014-06-17 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2032) flatten-maven-plugin: model resolver fails in case of external parent POM

2014-06-17 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2027) flatten-maven-plugin: ability to preserve developer information

2014-06-17 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2032) flatten-maven-plugin: model resolver fails in case of external parent POM

2014-06-13 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2032) flatten-maven-plugin: model resolver fails in case of external parent POM

2014-06-13 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2032) flatten-maven-plugin: model resolver fails in case of external parent POM

2014-06-12 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

Re: [mojo-dev] Looks like bamboo is in bad shape??

2014-05-31 Thread Robert Scholte
Try https://bamboo-ci.codehaus.org/userlogin!default.action Robert Op Fri, 30 May 2014 23:52:39 +0200 schreef Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com: I am not able to login into it. Can someone confirm? -D -- Forwarded message -- From: Codehaus Bamboo bamboo-ser...@codehaus.org Date:

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [19715] trunk/mojo/flatten-maven-plugin/src/site/xdoc/usage.xml: MOJO-2027: added documentation

2014-05-30 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Thu, 29 May 2014 22:54:17 +0200 schreef Jörg Hohwiller jo...@j-hohwiller.de: Hi, Hi Jörg, Hi Robert, I very much appreciate your support and contribution. However, your in the middle of the discussion commit caused me some SVN conflict and merge trouble. I did my best to resolve but

Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release sonar-maven-plugin 2.3

2014-05-27 Thread Robert Scholte
Try using https instead of http Robert Op Tue, 27 May 2014 16:26:13 +0200 schreef Julien HENRY henr...@yahoo.fr: The problem with Nexus is now fixed. I'm now stopped at step: Update the plugins.apt document to reflect the new release. Redeploy the mojo site by executing mvn site-deploy and

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [19715] trunk/mojo/flatten-maven-plugin/src/site/xdoc/usage.xml: MOJO-2027: added documentation

2014-05-26 Thread Robert Scholte
/maven-how-to-merging-plugin-configuration-in-complex-projects/ Op Sun, 25 May 2014 23:27:35 +0200 schreef Jörg Hohwiller jo...@j-hohwiller.de: Am 24.05.2014 12:03, schrieb Robert Scholte: Hi, Hi Robert, seems like I missed a mail. no worries... What I don't understand is why you want

Re: [mojo-dev] Re: [mojo-scm] [19715] trunk/mojo/flatten-maven-plugin/src/site/xdoc/usage.xml: MOJO-2027: added documentation

2014-05-24 Thread Robert Scholte
(pomDescriptor) so future Maven features could help with some magic I can not see yet? Best regards Jörg Am 06.05.2014 20:49, schrieb Robert Scholte: Ideally what we want is some sort of xslt, however that's probably too heavy and too complex. Instead you could think of something like (when written

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MMOCKRM-13) downloading /favicon.ico throws an emptyStackException

2014-05-24 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MMOCKRM-13) downloading /favicon.ico throws an emptyStackException

2014-05-23 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte created an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MMOCKRM-12) Expose settings.xml for non-localhost users

2014-05-22 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Fixed

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MCOBERTURA-188) Not supported following method call this.Stringtest()

2014-05-22 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MMOCKRM-12) Expose settings.xml for non-localhost users

2014-05-21 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte created an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MMOCKRM-12) Expose settings.xml for non-localhost users

2014-05-21 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte assigned an issue to Robert Scholte

Re: [mojo-dev] Seeking karma to create JIRA project for release purpose

2014-05-15 Thread Robert Scholte
These are your options - Ask Arnaud, Stephen, Brett or Ben directly or - try to contact supp...@codehaus.org or - create a jira issue for the HAUS project thanks, Robert Op Wed, 14 May 2014 17:45:40 +0200 schreef Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com: Hello MOJO team How do I go about getting this?

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MOJO-2030) flatten-maven-plugin overrides basedir and sets it to target/, so src/site/site.xml is not used and any documentation beneath src/site is not rendered

2014-05-15 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte commented on an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MVERSIONS-256) properties do not update if they contain : in their names

2014-05-15 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte updated an issue

[mojo-dev] [jira] (MVERSIONS-256) properties do not update if they contain : in their names

2014-05-15 Thread Robert Scholte (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Robert Scholte closed an issue as Won't Fix

Re: [mojo-dev] Seeking karma to create JIRA project for release purpose

2014-05-15 Thread Robert Scholte
Dan, https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2379 has the wrong title, which might result in an unwanted Jira key for the project Robert Op Thu, 15 May 2014 21:12:16 +0200 schreef Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com: Thanks Robert -Dan On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Robert Scholte codeh

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >