On 10/2/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did that back in August :-)
True, I remember. We really should have the releases plugin update
src/changes/changes.xml ...
Thanks,
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
--
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
as you can see on
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RatProposal
the RAT project aims to enter the Apache Incubator. At that point, it
seems to make more sense, if the rat-maven-plugin becomes a part of
the base project. More precisely, I would like to
- release t
+1
-D
On 10/2/07, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +0 Raphaël
>
> 2007/10/2, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > as you can see on
> > >
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RatProposal
> > >
> > > the RAT project aims to enter t
+0 Raphaël
2007/10/2, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as you can see on
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RatProposal
> >
> > the RAT project aims to enter the Apache Incubator. At that point, it
> > seems to make more sense, if the rat-ma
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
as you can see on
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RatProposal
the RAT project aims to enter the Apache Incubator. At that point, it
seems to make more sense, if the rat-maven-plugin becomes a part of
the base project. More precisely, I would like to
- release t
Hi,
as you can see on
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RatProposal
the RAT project aims to enter the Apache Incubator. At that point, it
seems to make more sense, if the rat-maven-plugin becomes a part of
the base project. More precisely, I would like to
- release the current projects state
