Hi, all
I have been working on integrating MXNet with Spark in a more full-fledged
manner.
One of the most critical pre-conditions is to make parameter server in
mxnet support multiple workers per process. I created the PR in
https://github.com/dmlc/ps-lite/pull/121 (OK, sorry for being lateI
Build for MXNet branch master has broken. Please view the build at
https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-mxnet/job/master/703/
CI catches problems all the time. I don't think many of us can afford
to build all the flavors and architectures in their laptops or
workstations, so we have to rely on CI to catch all kinds of errors
from compilation errors to bugs plus regressions, specially in a
project which has so many build f
Totally agree that CI is useful. Actually, I wrote the jenkinsfile and
setup the jenkins server before moving to apache server. I just mention
that we cannot rely on the CI test. It currently covers operator unittests
and regression test on several cnns. But the code coverage isn't great. If
a PR t
I think we are still using CI to catch bugs. And we should take caution
when merging something that CI did not catch up due to the response time.
This do not contradict what comitter can do with their best judgement. For
example, I would normally switch CI off and merge simple typo fixes. If the
fi
That's how it works before, committers can stop a CI test if it's a simple
fix, such as typo. But with apache's jenkins server, it's nontrivial to
request the permission to stop/start a CI test.
I had a thought about to let the CI be smart enough to only run the tests
related to the code changes.
We plan to add the possibility to trigger or stop a build by adding a
comment in the pull request - this will be added after we switched to the
new CI.
Am 01.12.2017 7:25 nachm. schrieb "Mu Li" :
> That's how it works before, committers can stop a CI test if it's a simple
> fix, such as typo. But
Build for MXNet branch master has broken. Please view the build at
https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-mxnet/job/master/704/
Thanks Sergey :)
Cc'd to dev@ as an FYI.
Hen
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Sergey Kolychev <
sergeykolychev.git...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, sure please change it as needed. Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Hen wrote:
>
>> Hi Sergey,
>>
>> In looking at the mxnet perl-package,
One question about the below. We've noted that much of the source code for
MXNet is coming from the external DMLC repos. Are there plans to move
those repos into the ASF?
John
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:13 PM Hen wrote:
> +1.
>
> Items I note should happen post release are:
>
> * Move the vario
10 matches
Mail list logo