Hi Steffen,
yes, it's correct. Naveen already sent me an invitation, thanks for that!
/Holger
On 18/10/18 20:34, Steffen Rochel wrote:
Hi Holger - MXNet Slack is based on email. Is ho.k...@zoho.com correct?
Steffen
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:03 PM Holger Kohr
wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to join
I suggest we discuss on what the revised criteria for committers will be
and how do committers move up to become a PMC member before voting on the
separation ? I would like to see if that helps grow the community before
Voting on this.
@Chris Olivier Can you clarify what you mean by
bonafide
IMHO it’s not a great idea to develop a hard criteria for committer and PMC
as if it were some sort of checklist. If that were the case, then people
would tend to be just laser-focused on checking items off the list rather
than a bonafied drive to improve the product and the community. It would
Thanks Micheal for making the process clearer to me. It helps quite a bit.
Also thanks to Chris and Steffen for your clarification and input.
I think there are two issues that are intermingled in considering this. One
relates to separating levels of committer and PMC member. The other, as
Very nice!
Pedro
> On 17. Oct 2018, at 23:12, Alfredo Luque
> wrote:
>
> This is huge. Thanks for working on this. Is there a similar plan with eg;
> tensor-rt support being ported into the main cuda-9.x packages?
>
> On October 17, 2018 at 2:10:20 PM, Alex Zai (aza...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
Thanks Alex for bringing up this proposal. As far as I know, applied to the
MKL-DNN backend, MXNet is the most performant framework on CPU side now.
Especially that the recent subgraph fusion feature boosts the performance a lot
again.
Thus, I think it’s worth to make it default and let more
Haibin's proposed "For active contributors we first invite them to become
our committers. Later on as they make significant contribution, we can
invite them to PMC."
Several people raised the question what defines "active contributors" and
"make significant contribution". In my view the discussion