Hi,
Can you please add me to the MXNet slack for the channels #mxnet and
#mxnet-scala.
-Ashutosh
Invite sent.
-Qing
On 1/9/19, 2:18 PM, "louisfeng.list@"
wrote:
Could I please get an invite to the Slack channel too?
Thanks,
Louis
On 2019/01/04 16:09:03, "Lv, Tao A" wrote:
> Invitation is sent to mue...@amazon.com. You can find mxnet in ASF
channels.
Could I please get an invite to the Slack channel too?
Thanks,
Louis
On 2019/01/04 16:09:03, "Lv, Tao A" wrote:
> Invitation is sent to mue...@amazon.com. You can find mxnet in ASF channels.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Muenz, Edison [mailto:mue...@amazon.com.INVALID]
> Sent:
Happy New Year!
I want to follow up on this PR:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12502
It looks like it's been reviewed, passed all tests and ready to be merged,
could anyone help and finalize it?
Thanks,
Louis
I think this is a nit and it is hard to argue which one is best, everyone
has their own preference.
In this case, Google C style is a simple convention that everyone can refer
to, and I would suggest we just stick with that convention
Tianqi
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:44 PM Pedro Larroy
wrote:
>
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:44 PM Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> Hi MXNet community
>
> cpplint seems to complain when the order of includes is not [own,
> system, other]
>
> But the general best practice in C++ is [own, project, 3rd party,
> system] for the reasons explained in this stackoverflow answer:
