Technically, mshadow is sufficient for MXNet. Adopting other libraries (
eigen or xtensor) will unnecessarily increase the codebase complexity
without any additional gains.
Given that mshadow is only used by mxnet. I do support donating it into
mxnet codebase.
To respect the original mshadow commu
Do you have a link to both of these proposals?
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 20:14 Anirudh Acharya wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> mshadow is mostly used for tensor arithmetic. There have been discussions
> about including it within mxnet. I think it is a good idea.
>
> As a more long term solution using librar
Hi Pedro,
mshadow is mostly used for tensor arithmetic. There have been discussions
about including it within mxnet. I think it is a good idea.
As a more long term solution using libraries like eigen to perform linear
algebra operations was also suggested by anirudh2290@. I think xtensor(
https:/
Hi
Some developers have noticed that working in mshadow is cumbersome as
it's a 3rdparty subrepo.
Since mshadow is a bunch of headers which don't have much of
independent tests / library functionality, me and other developers
believe that it would be good to assimilate this code in the
repository
I agree with Tianqi and Marco. Probably what should happen is to let cmake
be the default in some minor release, and completely deprecate makefiles in
2.0.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:23 AM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> I think this is rather about the depreciation of the make based build
> system. We c
I think this is rather about the depreciation of the make based build
system. We currently have make and cmake in parallel but with diverging
feature support.
-Marco
Tianqi Chen schrieb am Fr., 5. Apr. 2019, 11:42:
> I am in favor of using CMake. And I personally think CMake is not something
>
I am in favor of using CMake. And I personally think CMake is not something
that has to be introduced in a 2.0. It can simply be part of a minor
release.
Tianqi
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kellen Sunderland wrote:
> Hello MXNet devs,
>
> I'd like to start a thread discussing what our build
+1 single build system.
> -Original Message-
> From: Qing Lan [mailto:lanking...@live.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:27 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Single build system
>
> +1 to have a single build system
>
> Currently the
