Hi,
While 1.4.1 vote on general@incubator is still on going, I’d like to propose
that we start preparing 1.5.0 release.
1.5.0 will include changes that dates back to last year and there has been a
lot of new features and improvements in it, so it will likely time us more time
to prepare than 1
Just invited you. Welcome!
-sz
On 2019/05/06 11:21:49, Geoff Bull wrote:
> Please invite me to slack.
>
> Thanks
> Geoff
>
>
Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for your reply.
> I personally prefer small incremental changes, and starting with some MVP,
> where M is
> minimal, meaning least possible effort (e.g. number of dependencies) used
> from conan.
Agreed. That said, this seems like a case where adoption decision can't be
b
Please invite me to slack.
Thanks
Geoff
Thank you Kellen. Great to hear that~
-Original Message-
From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 3:27 PM
To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0
Hey Tao. Fixed my problem by
Hi Sheng Zha,
> Currently, the linked PR only includes OpenBLAS
actually, it's OpenBLAS + OpenCV + lapack, three libraries as
proof-of-concept
> A proof-of-concept that shows it actually replaces more dependency than
openblas would be helpful
may we define an actual scope then, e.g. how much dep
Hey Tao. Fixed my problem by recompiling cmake with ssl support (so
basically just a problem on my end). After that MKL downloaded correctly,
and everything compiled correctly with Anirudh's build flags.
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 6:59 PM Lv, Tao A wrote:
> Hi Kellen, does the problem still exist