Congrats Sam! Keep up the great work.
On Thu, 30 Jul, 2020, 8:49 AM Zhang Zhi, wrote:
> Congrats Sam!!
>
> -Zhi
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:30 PM Chen, Ciyong
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Sam!
> > Those are great features to MXNet.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Zhao, Patric
+ 1
* Built from source on Ubuntu 18.04 with CUDA, CUDNN
* Verified test_higher_order_grad.py
Great job!
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:02 PM Chaitanya Bapat
wrote:
> +1
>
> - Built from source on Ubuntu18 with CUDA ON, USE_INT64_TENSOR_SIZE ON
> - Verified large tensor tests work as expected on
+1 Great Idea! It is quite useful to have working examples to refer to.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:17 PM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> +1 good idea!
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 5:39 AM Skalicky, Sam
> wrote:
>
> > +1 For regular testing, enhanced doc/tutorial
> >
> > > On Jul 15, 2020, at 7:40 PM,
Great Job. Would be really helpful.
Regards,
Kshiteej
On Wed, 25 Mar, 2020, 7:29 AM Chaitanya Bapat, wrote:
> Yes Denisa, you can use it on existing PRs as well. Sorry for miswording.
>
> Bot will comment instructions on how-to-use for every new PR.
> You can invoke bot for all the PRs.
>
>
>
Congrats Anirudh!
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019, 11:13 Sheng Zha wrote:
> Congrats! Now Anirudh is officially the most popular name among the MXNet
> committers :P
>
> -sz
>
> On 2019/09/27 22:57:22, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Congrats Anirudh!
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Furkan KAMCI
> >
> >
Congratulations!!
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019, 14:51 Marco de Abreu wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> -Marco
>
> MiraiWK WKCN schrieb am So., 8. Sep. 2019, 06:10:
>
> > Congrats, Junru!
> >
> > 发件人: Sheng Zha
> > 发送时间: 2019年9月8日 11:14
> > 收件人: d...@mxnet.apache.org
> >
Congratulations Lai!
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019, 09:29 Zhao, Patric wrote:
> Congratulation, Lai.
>
> Well done for the very challenge release 1.5 and you make the progress
> going smoothly
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: kellen sunderland
> > Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2019 9:32 AM
> >
+1
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 04:28 Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> Seems 3.6 is a reasonable choice.
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:15 PM Marco de Abreu
> wrote:
> >
> > Looking at EOL is certainly a good idea! I think once we get closer to
> > deprecation, we can check adoption statistics to make a
