Re: MXNet package

2018-02-15 Thread Pedro Larroy
, Can Balioglu <cbalio...@fastmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Actually my team had the exact same requirement and we now have an internal > MXNet package with all the necessary header files. Note that if you have some > custom operators and plan to write an extension

Re: MXNet package

2018-02-14 Thread Anirudh
Hi Pedro, Canonical added snap package for MXNet last year: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/4852 Would be good to verify if it works for your use case. Anirudh On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Marco de Abreu < marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Sounds like a great idea!

Re: MXNet package

2018-02-14 Thread Marco de Abreu
Sounds like a great idea! Please also consider the issues labelled as Cpp package on GitHub. -Marco Am 14.02.2018 6:48 nachm. schrieb "Pedro Larroy" < pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>: > Hi > > We would like to use MXNet from C++ without Python. Currently the cpp > package depends on additional

MXNet package

2018-02-14 Thread Pedro Larroy
Hi We would like to use MXNet from C++ without Python. Currently the cpp package depends on additional MXNet headers, nnvm and dmlc. As far as I know we don't have a standalone package of MXNet with library + headers. I would like to create a deb package of MXNet for example which has the