Thanks Steffen
This document looks great and to me showcases clearly the areas in which we
can improve. CO50, CO30 and IN10 standout to me in particular.
Pedro.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:38 PM Steffen Rochel
wrote:
> I started a draft assessment -
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ
I started a draft assessment -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+MXNet
based
on my personal view. Please keep in mind I'm new to the project and Apache
(just attended my first ApacheCon!!). The items I was not sure myself I
marked as "???".
Jim
So Isabel, are you saying that if we publish a clearer TODO list or
contributions needed material we might get more contribution there?
One thing that I like from other projects is to make a list of low-hanging
fruit issues or easy contributions that newcomers can pick to get familiar
with the pro
On 28/09/18 11:27, kellen sunderland wrote:
I'd love to see some more
sustained contribution from other open source communities to help us out in
this area
That's not exactly the model I have seen to work. What I have seen works
really well at other projects is pulling users in as committer
Hey Jim, welcome to the community.
To the best of my knowledge we have not yet discussed/run a Maturity
Model. My gut feel is that MXNet would come away a fairly bi-model
result. My view of the project is that it's getting the Apache Way right
in terms of Code, Releases, and Quality. I think th
As a newly "minted" mentor, I'm getting my feet wet on determining where the
project is and where it needs to go in order to be ready for graduation...
Has the project run the Maturity Model against itself? How do we stack up? What
areas of improvement could we benefit from (this might be indepe
