Hello Everyone,
There was a suggestion during the 1.1 release vote to remove this file [1]
from the released source since it is licensed under CC-BY-2.5.
However, this file is a part of the googletest submodule and can’t simply
be removed. Does anyone know how we can deal with the licensing of thi
Hi Meghna.
Are you sure the DevGuide of googletest is a problem?
Check this out:
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa
Pedro.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Meghna Baijal
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> There was a suggestion during the 1.1 release vote to remove this file [1]
> fro
Thank you Pedro for looking into this. The suggestion came from PMC during
1.1 voting cycle.
However, the link does seem to indicate that including it should be ok. I
also found other Apache projects that have included this file.
I will review the LICENSE and NOTICE requirements and let the file r
Noting that the linked FAQ is for CC-BY-SA and unmodified media (ie:
images, sound, video); so it's not relevant.
I think this is worth raising on legal-discuss@. CC-BY software is an
issue, but resolved.html hasn't stated anything regarding CC-BY for a
documentation file.
Hen
On Thu, Apr 5, 201
Good point, I thought text is media, but I'm not a lawyer. Just to be
clear, that this refers to that particular documentation file, the software
is BSD licensed.
Pedro.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Hen wrote:
> Noting that the linked FAQ is for CC-BY-SA and unmodified media (ie:
> images, s
Thank you Henri, Pedro.
Yes, we are only referring to the one documentation file within google
test.
Henri,
Could you please guide me on the best approach to take an issue to the
legal-discuss@.
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:42 AM, Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> Good point, I thought t
Hi All,
Until we resolve the licensing issue regarding this file [1] after
discussion on legal-discuss, there are a couple of ways to handle this file
for the 1.2 release as follows -
Option 1. Remove this one file [1] from the release src tar (though not
from the Github mxnet repo). This might le
Hi Meghna,
Until the discussion is complete on legal-discuss@,
we can proceed with Option 2, and add this as a known issue to the release
notes.
Please let me know if you have any other suggestions or opinions.
Anirudh
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Meghna Baijal
wrote:
> Hi All,
> Until w
There’s nothing special process-wise; subscribe to the list and email the
question. The more detail and links the better to avoid any
misunderstandings.
Hen
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM Meghna Baijal
wrote:
> Thank you Henri, Pedro.
> Yes, we are only referring to the one documentation file
