Re: Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

On 2018/01/26 22:15:37, Naveen Swamy wrote: > Since this change from ml.dmlc to org.apache is breaking and not backward> > compatible, it requires a major version upgrade, I reverted the change> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9579.> > > I think It warrants a separate discussion o

Re: Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

Since this change from ml.dmlc to org.apache is breaking and not backward compatible, it requires a major version upgrade, I reverted the change https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9579. I think It warrants a separate discussion on how to manage release lifecycles of the various languag

Re: Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

Since we now have changed package prefix to org.apache, does someone have guidance for posting it to Apache's Maven Repository? ml.dmlc.mxnet was posted to oss.sonatype.org. 2018-01-04 17:14 GMT-08:00 Lupesko, Hagay : > Suneel, > > I tend to think for this issue, GitHub issue is good enough and

Re: Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

Suneel, I tend to think for this issue, GitHub issue is good enough and we do not need JIRA. Can you clarify what is the advantage you see in using JIRA over GitHub issue for this specific case? Thanks! Hagay On 1/4/18, 16:34, "Suneel Marthi" wrote: Jira has been around for a while -

Re: Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

Jira has been around for a while - https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MXNET/ switch to using jira On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 7:31 PM, Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Hi, > > As currently, MXNet does not have Jira project, I have created github issue > for now. > https://github.com/apache/incubator-m

Re: Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

Hi, As currently, MXNet does not have Jira project, I have created github issue for now. https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/9315 Will create the PR and link the issue there. Thanks, Roshani On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Naveen Swamy wrote: > Hi Suneel, > > Did we decide that

Re: Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

Hi Suneel, Did we decide that we will using Jira going forward? If not, can someone summarize on the improvement email on the consensus and lets make it universal and how to use it, what is expected, etc., For the record, I like the idea of using Jira for more openness. Also, MXNet does not have

Re: Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

anywhere to mark it as a breaking change in the latest version? On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Hello all, > > I am working on publishing mxnet-scala release to maven repository and as a > part of that, I will also be refactoring mxnet-scala code/tests/example and > docs

Re: Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

Is there a Jira for this? Please create a Jira and reference that in the PR for this. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Hello all, > > I am working on publishing mxnet-scala release to maven repository and as a > part of that, I will also be refactoring mxnet-scala code/te

Refactoring MXNet scala code to use "org.apache.mxnet"

Hello all, I am working on publishing mxnet-scala release to maven repository and as a part of that, I will also be refactoring mxnet-scala code/tests/example and docs to use "org.apache.mxnet" instead of "ml.dmlc.mxnet". Currently, MXNet-Scala