Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Commons 1.1.2

2006-02-11 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi, This bug has been there for several months (since the new ReducedHTMLParser implementation was added). It is only triggered for documents containing elements with unquoted attribute values, eg input type=text MyFaces is, therefore, usable with this bug in it; people do generally quote

Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Commons 1.1.2

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
Well lets just remember to fix this one ASAP in the next release. I have some ideas on how we can improve our JIRA process too but right now everyone seems anxious for a new release and to update the website. Sean On 2/11/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, This bug has been

Re: We need a good demo application

2006-02-11 Thread Carsten Fregin
Thank you, Jesse Alexander. Ah.. isn't there any irc-channel running? Thought, I had seen somewere a server/channel. I would like to add some questions to be solved. Should we use the wiki as communication platform? I would not like to polute the dev list with coordination of a competition...

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-1111) tld update: commandNavigation2 also needs disabled* Attributes

2006-02-11 Thread Ernst Fastl (JIRA)
tld update: commandNavigation2 also needs disabled* Attributes --- Key: MYFACES- URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES- Project: MyFaces Type: Improvement Components: Tomahawk

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-1111) tld update: commandNavigation2 also needs disabled* Attributes

2006-02-11 Thread Ernst Fastl (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-?page=all ] Ernst Fastl updated MYFACES-: - Attachment: CommandNavigation2.patch tld update: commandNavigation2 also needs disabled* Attributes

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
By the way, Given how much the ajax-related stuff changes it might be better to not push this stuff into the trunk until we're absolutely sure that's how we want it. In general I don't think needing something on a project at work is a sufficient reason to put something into tomahawk. You can

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Marinschek
You are absolutely right. In any case, we don't talk about pushing in an AJAX component, but the dojo-framework - which is a well known and respected framework and shouldn't represent a problem in tomahawk. We don't want to use it's AJAX functionality in tomahawk, but the event-listener stuff.

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
So are we basically redistributing the javascript stuff from Dojo? Sean On 2/11/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are absolutely right. In any case, we don't talk about pushing in an AJAX component, but the dojo-framework - which is a well known and respected framework and

[jira] Closed: (MYFACES-1111) tld update: commandNavigation2 also needs disabled* Attributes

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Marinschek (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-?page=all ] Martin Marinschek closed MYFACES-: -- Fix Version: Nightly Resolution: Fixed Assign To: Martin Marinschek thanks again, Ernst. regards, Martin tld update:

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1110) findComponent return null for a valid clientId

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Marinschek (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1110?page=comments#action_12366012 ] Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1110: Try to switch over to t:dataTable. I implemented a new version of findComponent for this kind of problems.

[maven] Issue with Core Release

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
I've released commons and I'm trying to *prepare* the core project for release. I'm running into some difficulty though. [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] - --- [INFO] Can't release project due to non released dependencies :

Re: [maven] Issue with Core Release

2006-02-11 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
The biggest issue is the XSLT plugin. That is a snapshot and its not a myfaces plugin. The only solution I can think of is to add it to the maven project as our own plugin and release it (with a myfaces group id.) Then when they finally get around to releasing the plugin we could switch to

Re: [maven] Issue with Core Release

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
I also posted about issue on the maven dev list. There is definitely room for improvement in the release plugin. It doesn't really envision you creating a branch for a release that will be down the road some time. I don't see why we need to switch to final versions of a plugin until we are

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Bruno Aranda
Yes, basically, with some util classes to use the dojo features from another components, Bruno On 2/11/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So are we basically redistributing the javascript stuff from Dojo? Sean On 2/11/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are

Re: [maven] Issue with Core Release

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Marinschek
I don't even see why you need to be forced to use the final version of a plugin - you can have an alpha-state plugin doing something on a very mature project. regards, Martin On 2/11/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also posted about issue on the maven dev list. There is

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
Ok sounds good. On 2/11/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, basically, with some util classes to use the dojo features from another components, Bruno On 2/11/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So are we basically redistributing the javascript stuff from Dojo? Sean

Re: We need a good demo application

2006-02-11 Thread Dennis Byrne
I believe you are looking for #myfaces , irc.freenode.net . Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Carsten Fregin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 04:52 PM To: 'MyFaces Development' Subject: Re: We need a good demo application Thank you, Jesse Alexander. Ah..

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1110) findComponent return null for a valid clientId

2006-02-11 Thread Dave (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1110?page=comments#action_12366020 ] Dave commented on MYFACES-1110: --- I was using t:dataTable. I just realized that the clientId for components in a dataTable has row number (e.g., 1 in the example above), it

New website is published!

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
The new website is up (with many broken links and omissions.) Continuum should be publishing on the hour but sometimes it decides not to build in which case you can always force a build. Contact me offlist for the username and password to manage the continuum server (the link to the server

Re: New website is published!

2006-02-11 Thread Bruno Aranda
Thanks Sean for all the hard work. I also recommend the apt format to write documentation, because it is more straight-forward than the xdocs. The existing xdocs come from the old forrest site and we should replace them as we go on making new changes. And this is a message for the whole myfaces

[continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
If you force a build of site-deploy (MyFaces Site) maven complains about a permissions issue. Yet if you run mvn site-deploy (as mrmaven) it works no problem. Any ideas? Sean

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
According to the error log[1], maven is trying to copy a zip file (cotaining the site) to /www. That dir is owned by root so that explains the problem there. The weird thing is why does it works when i run it using maven from the command line? In that case I get ... Using private key:

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
FYI I am now getting the same bad result using both approaches. I updated the local pom from svn and now i have the problem there as well. Sean On 2/11/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the error log[1], maven is trying to copy a zip file (cotaining the site) to /www.

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Werner Punz
Hi Bruno, as we talked things over already over gtalk. I think we should wait a few more weeks, and should make a push for MyFaces 1.1.3. The reason, there is a foundation there, but we do not have any real components yet (which I would love to showcase) (except for the one development

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Bruno Aranda
Ok, sounds sensible. Let's wait for the next release then, so we have the time to test all this thoroughtly, Regards, Bruno On 2/11/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Bruno, as we talked things over already over gtalk. I think we should wait a few more weeks, and should make a push

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Werner Punz
Sean Schofield schrieb: So are we basically redistributing the javascript stuff from Dojo? Sean Yes the javascript stuff and some foundation classes and one tag which only do a sane initialization of the system. But as I said I think it is too early. I would have rather seen 1-2 actual

Re: [maven] Issue with Core Release

2006-02-11 Thread Manfred Geiler
Yes, I agree with Martin. Perhaps a better way would be to patch the release plugin so that it accepts SNAPSHOTs. Since I have dived into maven this week for a rather complex project at my company, I'm no longer a total maven newby. Hope I can afford some time next week to bring in my new

Re: New website is published!

2006-02-11 Thread Manfred Geiler
Sean, thanks very much. Looks great. I will try to spend a few hours next week to replace some of the blah blah pages... ;-) Manfred On 2/11/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The new website is up (with many broken links and omissions.) Continuum should be publishing on the hour but

Re: [maven] Issue with Core Release

2006-02-11 Thread Bernd Bohmann
I would never allow to patch the release plugin to accept a SNAPSHOT version. You don't need to use the final version you can use a released version but never a SNAPSHOT.(The release version maybe a alpha or beta release) Regards Bernd Manfred Geiler schrieb: Yes, I agree with Martin.

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Bernd Bohmann
fixed Sean Schofield schrieb: FYI I am now getting the same bad result using both approaches. I updated the local pom from svn and now i have the problem there as well. Sean On 2/11/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
Bernd, I don't think this does it. It just creates a second myfaces.apache.org dir inside the first one. So you're publishing but nobody will see it. I suspect the problem is that the *first* time you deploy it does a copy. Second time it tries to do a zip and untar. That's the only way I

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Arvid Hülsebus
BTW, Internet Explorer has problems rendering transparent PNGs... Regards, Arvid

Re: [maven] Issue with Core Release

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
Hehehe I knew Bernd would go crazy at that suggestion. :-) @Manfred: SNAPSHOT has a special connatation in Maven. So if you want to call it alpha or whatever, you can just do that. But SNAPSHOT tells Maven to keep checking for a newer version, etc. I will see if I can find the codehaus mailing

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Bernd Bohmann
Oh, i see it. I will remove the parent ref to the master pom and copy the maillist and developer list in the site pom. This should work until we have a better solution. Regards Bernd Sean Schofield schrieb: Bernd, I don't think this does it. It just creates a second myfaces.apache.org

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Bernd Bohmann
It this ok for you? Bernd Bohmann schrieb: Oh, i see it. I will remove the parent ref to the master pom and copy the maillist and developer list in the site pom. This should work until we have a better solution. Regards Bernd Sean Schofield schrieb: Bernd, I don't think this does it.

test build deps between different projects

2006-02-11 Thread Dennis Byrne
I have a couple unit tests for org.apache.myfaces.config w/ a dependency on some of the stuff in org.apache.myfaces.mock.api . This causes a build error. I take it tests in impl cannot have build deps on stuff from the tests in api ? Will moving the mock classes to commons solve this ? And

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Werner Punz
Btw. just to add something to this discussion, Alex Russel the core maintainer of Dojo asked me for permission to blog that we now use Dojo in Myfaces. If no one objects I would like to give him the permission so that he can spread the news a little bit ;-) As it is very likely that we wont pull

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
On 2/11/06, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, i see it. I will remove the parent ref to the master pom and copy the maillist and developer list in the site pom. This should work until we have a better solution. How will this help? Regards Bernd Sean

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
Yes we should use the filter. Sorry I forgot (I use firefox.) Do you want to do the honors? Sean On 2/11/06, Arvid Hülsebus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But there is a workaround via an IE specific filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader Regards, Arvid

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
It this ok for you? I'd rather not do this. That is one of the reasons we went to the trouble of a master-pom. Sean

Re: test build deps between different projects

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
I don't know enough about our Mock objects or Shale to say whether this is a good idea but I suspect it is a good idea. Now that commons is released you can add new mock stuff there. Just don't add the tests to impl for a day or two until we create the branch. Make sense? I'd like to know more

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Bernd Bohmann
I have started the continuum server with LANG=en_US.UTF-8. This is necessary for Weßendorf and Rossmüller You can see the site is published now. The ref to the master pom is removed until we have a better solution. But I don't would fight for a master pom :-) Regards Bernd Sean Schofield

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
I'm ok with this as a *temporary* fix but *why* does this fix work? Sean On 2/11/06, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have started the continuum server with LANG=en_US.UTF-8. This is necessary for Weßendorf and Rossmüller You can see the site is published now. The ref to the master

Re: test build deps between different projects

2006-02-11 Thread Dennis Byrne
I'd like to know more about your proposal for using Shale. It sounds like it would be a good idea but I don't personally have the time to investigate it. See these two for the background ... http://www.mail-archive.com/users%40myfaces.apache.org/msg16478.html

Re: test build deps between different projects

2006-02-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/11/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @Craig: Is Shale officially alpha yet? @Wendy: There are snapshots being posted now right? Shale 1.0.0 is officially alpha, but there have been many improvements to the test framework since then. Snapshots are available... I update them as

Re: test build deps between different projects

2006-02-11 Thread Sean Schofield
Sounds very promising. We just need to make sure there will be an alpha/beta release available by the release after next. Sean On 2/11/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know more about your proposal for using Shale. It sounds like it would be a good idea but I don't

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/11/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /www is owned by root so maven is denied when copying the tarball to it. I'm including Wendy on the 'cc.' She takes care of this for Struts so maybe she has some ideas. The Struts site is still done with m1, maven site:sshdeploy works

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1110) findComponent return null for a valid clientId

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Marinschek (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1110?page=comments#action_12366049 ] Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1110: Hmmm... yes, you should be able to search from the view-root no problem. Can you debug a little through

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Marinschek
+1 on blogging on myfaces and dojo ;) regards, Martin On 2/11/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw. just to add something to this discussion, Alex Russel the core maintainer of Dojo asked me for permission to blog that we now use Dojo in Myfaces. If no one objects I would like to

Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk

2006-02-11 Thread Grant Smith
I think its amusing that he asked permission. He obviously doesn't read the Bile Blog.On 2/11/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:+1 on blogging on myfaces and dojo ;) regards,MartinOn 2/11/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw. just to add something to this discussion, Alex

Re: [continuum] Site deploy problem

2006-02-11 Thread Arvid Hülsebus
Adding the following to style.css #banner img { behavior: url(css/png-fix.htc); } and placing the other attachements like this: site/src/site/resources/css/ png-fix.htc site/src/site/resources/images/ transparent.gif solves the problem for the top level HTML files... perhaps the banner

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1110) findComponent return null for a valid clientId

2006-02-11 Thread Dave (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1110?page=comments#action_12366055 ] Dave commented on MYFACES-1110: --- Do you remember which nightly build that might have the fix? I would like to give it a test. Thanks! findComponent return null for a valid

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1110) findComponent return null for a valid clientId

2006-02-11 Thread Dennis Byrne (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1110?page=comments#action_12366060 ] Dennis Byrne commented on MYFACES-1110: --- If this is beforePhase for the restore view phase, then findComponent() should be returning null. Are you getting this for

Re: [jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1110) findComponent return null for a valid clientId

2006-02-11 Thread Jacob Hookom
findComponent has nothing to do with client ids. They work off of different logic. Martin Marinschek (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1110?page=comments#action_12366049 ] Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1110: